Official Chuseok Card Event (3 Viewers)

LoveYooShaSha · 22 September 2021

Abeamus said:
Just curious once someone gets one of the gif cards are they free to trade away the months needed for it?

Vikki said:
We haven't thought about that, I'll bring it up with the card team and get back to you.

I propose/suggest tat once a user gets a season card- the season card has to be traded with all 3 of the month cards/disappears when the set is split up.

Also i noticed tat there's a loophole for limited cards (tat already happened once or twice earlier) tat shd be closed: if a user were to get 90% percent of 12 cards or 11/12 n requested another card-its guaranteed to get tat 12th card. Since this kinda already happened twice, is it fair to other users if say 3 or 4 users traded amongst each other to get 11 cards n then requested another card, then tat user woould get all 12 cards n could share 4 sets amonhst all 4 users in tat group. As i say this already happened on a larger scale in another case but i think it was an isolated case tat hasnt repeated so far so i dint bring it up. It hypothetically could hv happened during pranked/st patrick event too but i dint notice/think of it then.

Tldr: step 1) trade for as many month cards as can be gotten
Step 2) complete 12 mths by end of Chuseok event
Step 3) share amongst those who contributed-say user 1 gets winter set, user 2 gets summer set and so forth
Question is this allowed/against the rules? Shd there be a rule against brute forcing and redistributing after brute forcing?(cos this already happened before for another case and it was kinda allowed/slipped through unnoticed) i kinda thot it wasnt a big deal cos i dunno, it was a one time thing.

Ahsoka · 22 September 2021

LoveYooShaSha said:
I propose/suggest tat once a user gets a season card- the season card has to be traded with all 3 of the month cards/disappears when the set is split up.

Also i noticed tat there's a loophole for limited cards (tat already happened once or twice earlier) tat shd be closed: if a user were to get 90% percent of 12 cards or 11/12 n requested another card-its guaranteed to get tat 12th card. Since this kinda already happened twice, is it fair to other users if say 3 or 4 users traded amongst each other to get 11 cards n then requested another card, then tat user woould get all 12 cards n could share 4 sets amonhst all 4 users in tat group. As i say this already happened on a larger scale in another case but i think it was an isolated case tat hasnt repeated so far so i dint bring it up. It hypothetically could hv happened during pranked/st patrick event too but i dint notice/think of it then.

Tldr: step 1) trade for as many month cards as can be gotten
Step 2) complete 12 mths by end of Chuseok event
Step 3) share amongst those who contributed-say user 1 gets winter set, user 2 gets summer set and so forth
Question is this allowed/against the rules? Shd there be a rule against brute forcing and redistributing after brute forcing?(cos this already happened before for another case and it was kinda allowed/slipped through unnoticed) i kinda thot it wasnt a big deal cos i dunno, it was a one time thing.

I’ll bring it up with the card team, we had decided that you can keep the gif cards but I agree that sharing among other users to get them gif cards then trading back is a little unfair.

Abeamus · 22 September 2021

LoveYooShaSha said:
I propose/suggest tat once a user gets a season card- the season card has to be traded with all 3 of the month cards/disappears when the set is split up.

Also i noticed tat there's a loophole for limited cards (tat already happened once or twice earlier) tat shd be closed: if a user were to get 90% percent of 12 cards or 11/12 n requested another card-its guaranteed to get tat 12th card. Since this kinda already happened twice, is it fair to other users if say 3 or 4 users traded amongst each other to get 11 cards n then requested another card, then tat user woould get all 12 cards n could share 4 sets amonhst all 4 users in tat group. As i say this already happened on a larger scale in another case but i think it was an isolated case tat hasnt repeated so far so i dint bring it up. It hypothetically could hv happened during pranked/st patrick event too but i dint notice/think of it then.

Tldr: step 1) trade for as many month cards as can be gotten
Step 2) complete 12 mths by end of Chuseok event
Step 3) share amongst those who contributed-say user 1 gets winter set, user 2 gets summer set and so forth
Question is this allowed/against the rules? Shd there be a rule against brute forcing and redistributing after brute forcing?(cos this already happened before for another case and it was kinda allowed/slipped through unnoticed) i kinda thot it wasnt a big deal cos i dunno, it was a one time thing.

I did think of the months being used as tokens but it depends if the team want the month cards considered as part of the set since then you'd need to get 24 cards for 1 complete Chuseok set and it'd become the most expensive set.

The best solution I can think is not being able to trade the months once you collect the related season which the team could just check before doing whatever the trade is.

Ahsoka · 22 September 2021

Abeamus said:
I did think of the months being used as tokens but it depends if the team want the month cards considered as part of the set since then you'd need to get 24 cards for 1 complete Chuseok set and it'd become the most expensive set.

The best solution I can think is not being able to trade the months once you collect the related season which the team could just check before doing whatever the trade is.

Yeah that’s what we decided on, if you want the gif cards you need to keep the months for it.

LoveYooShaSha · 22 September 2021

Vikki said:
I’ll bring it up with the card team, we had decided that you can keep the gif cards but I agree that sharing among other users to get them gif cards then trading back is a little unfair.

The 2nd scenario is abt the same as wat i noticed happened earlier b4:
1 user collects 12 months by end of the event, gets all months n seasons then shares amongst those who traded-say user A gets season 1, user B gets season 2(if theres time left then maybe user A gets 2 srasons, user B gets 2 seasons: is this hypothetically allowed since IT ALREADY HAPPENED BEFORE.

Ahsoka · 22 September 2021

LoveYooShaSha said:
The 2nd scenario is abt the same as wat i noticed happened earlier b4:
1 user collects 12 months by end of the event, gets all months n seasons then shares amongst those who traded-say user A gets season 1, user B gets season 2(if theres time left then maybe user A gets 2 srasons, user B gets 2 seasons: is this hypothetically allowed since IT ALREADY HAPPENED BEFORE.

When did it happen? This event or in a past one?

Abeamus · 22 September 2021

Vikki said:
Yeah that’s what we decided on, if you want the gif cards you need to keep the months for it.

I would just add that re-roll could be a solution to if someone just wanted the season cards and wouldn't have no game breaking consequences

Ahsoka · 22 September 2021

Abeamus said:
I would just add that re-roll could be a solution to if someone just wanted the season cards and wouldn't have no game breaking consequences

As in they can reroll the cards they get? Or that they give up the month cards for the season ones?