- Joined
- 27 December 2021
- Messages
- 316
- Reactions Received
- 311
- Location
- pointy lubvot
- Website
- soulyca.carrd.co
- Cards
- View Profile
- KS Coins
- 0
- Fandom
- Multi
- Gender
- Bi-Gender
- Pronouns
- any
I used to agree with that opinion too, but now I understand why it’s there and why it is an official positionVisuals should not be a position in groups
agreed! i feel like it will make an idol feel bad about themselves if they didn't get that position :(Visuals should not be a position in groups
ah yes! its a sad thing that there's only two (from the last time I checked) groups that are Co-Ed. Even if they started dating, we should support it!We need more Co-Ed groups in kpop. Like companies are worried that the m & f members will start “dating” but like 1. Look at Kard; they’re Co-Ed and none of them are dating and have regular friendships 2. Even if two members did start dating, wtf is wrong with that?
I did a research paper on the visual role and I'll just copy a portion from it:agreed! i feel like it will make an idol feel bad about themselves if they didn't get that position :(
it's sad that it has become so normalised, I hope sooner or later they take off that positionI did a research paper on the visual role and I'll just copy a portion from it:
The visual role in kpop groups is a very toxic factor that correlates with poor body image. The role of the visual has become so normalized in the K-pop industry as it has been there since the first generation of what is considered modern K-pop in the 90s. Beauty is often said to be in the eye of the beholder, thus creating discrepancies between who truly deserves the visual role. When a member does not fit this standard according to the general public, this can lead to cyberbullying of the individual. “These comments would take a massive toll on anyone’s mental health, especially that of idols, who are already experiencing pressure from multiple other aspects of their lives. Visuals often face a paradox; if all a certain idol has is their beauty, then they’re talentless and dragging down the rest of the group. However, if they’re talented in other ways but don’t fit the beauty standards well, then they don’t deserve to be the visual of the group and they’re dragging down the entire group’s appearance” (Wu, 2020).
I find it hard to find a positive reason for the position, so in my opinion I wish it didn't existit's sad that it has become so normalised, I hope sooner or later they take off that position
AGREED WITH ALL OF THESE!! Tamed-Dashed did seem kinda boring, it took me a while to actually like the song lol1. Hwang Hyunjin owns long hair in kpop, esp long blonde hair.
2. I prefer certain idols with dyed hair over natural Colours.
3. Jennie is the it girl of kpop. Fight me
4. I found Tamed-Dashed by Enha to be a bit boring, but I love the bsides
5. The attention WOODZ is currently getting is a crime.
Checkmate recently disbanded tooWe need more Co-Ed groups in kpop. Like companies are worried that the m & f members will start “dating” but like 1. Look at Kard; they’re Co-Ed and none of them are dating and have regular friendships like other ggs & bgs
2. Even if two members did start dating, wtf is wrong with that?
AGREEDI HAVE SO MANY OPINIONS LMAO
æspa haven’t topped Black Mamba title track wise yet
AGREED!!!!!chaeryeong deserves more love
I didn't really like black mamba..I HAVE SO MANY OPINIONS LMAO
æspa haven’t topped Black Mamba title track wise yet
agreed :>Somi’s music is getting better. Like comparing Birthday to XOXO I think its a good improvement