Hmm.
I’m certainly worried for older groups. While fans of those groups make think the company doesn’t spend a lot on their promos and MVs, they actually do spend quite a bit proportional to their actual sales. And I wonder how this impacts soloist efforts too, insomuch that in the current SM structure, just about every member gets a solo. Is new ownership really gonna be onboard for low selling Xiumin or Onew albums? Taeyeon is a best selling soloist, Hyo not so much.
I’m also worried about the impact to some of SM’s strengths, notably the rock solid emphasis on vocal training, which isn’t terribly important to Hybe or Kakao. I would think that those two companies are in a knife fight to gain SM for its assets and one of its assets is that key point of difference in the market, the famous SM vocals, and so that would remain important in a new SM sub label structure. (I would hope but that also takes time and money and sometimes plays a role in slower launch times for new groups - the main vocalists are often the last to be added to groups because they are looking for a specific type of power to meet the brand expectations.)
Kpop fans may complain about NCT or SuperM, but both are tremendously successful, so I don’t see new ownership walking away from either of those. I know Kpop fans like to worry about charting and the GP etc etc but if Jaehyun has enough brand power to be featured in the global brand campaign for Prada and NCT can make 7 billion won in sales from NCT-Sanrio pajamas and shirts (with 3.5 billion in the first 3 days of sales) that are only available in Korea and Japan, no company actually gives af that they’ve never cracked the top 20 on Melon, let’s bffr.
All of this info is available in SM’s financial reports, but SM has traditionally relied on one massively successful group for about half of its business, while the remainder is split between other groups. This is a healthy business model with a diversified portfolio and healthier than many of the other labels that are much more reliant on just one group. What makes this even stronger from a business perspective is that the current majority group (NCT) actually has several strands of revenue with the sub-units + the full group + soloist potential. EXO was the previous majority group.
SM’s financials say the order of revenue is albums, then merch, then CFs, then tours (although with this year’s touring, I expect touring to move up in the rank), so again as much as Kpop fans pooh-
album sales, that shit matters on financial reports.
I don’t think Hybe or Kakao would disband EXO or RV, which are still comfortably profitable groups BUT I do think fans need to brace themselves for the idea new ownership isn’t going to spend more on these groups either. RV has solid album sales but with the numbers 4th Gen gg are pulling, new ownership would be focused on investing $$ and resources to be bigger players in that market. Even if they had more promos and distro, RV is not going to pull what a LSF or Ive is doing rn, sheerly for the emphasis in gg sales and trends around what’s newer (and sadly younger). If anything they’d also be investing more to promote aespa more regularly, not RV.
Similarly, EXO is stable but new leadership would be focused on NCT at the peak of their brand power and heading into solo power and creating new 4th Gen groups. (This was kind of the struggle I had when luvies and my own fandom EXOLs talked about how they should leave SM rather than resigning - where would they go? Both have brand power and solid fanbases but Hybe and JYP are very focused on building their 4th Gen brands and particularly at Hybe they’d be fifth or sixth banana. So that takes you into the Kakaos and other labels. GOT7 may have gotten their independence but that cb kinda came and went quietly under Warner Music. Again, both groups are solid but new companies aren’t gonna drop a NJ or Ive style marketing blitz against it, IMO, altho they would certainly do a better job of organizing things!)