News Hybe/MHJ Civil War Megathread (42 Viewers)

[Selfmate]

Well one of the emails involving the manager was leaked and they just throw NewJeans under the bus saying they were just following the members requests.

at least post the news report my friend lol

 

[Abeamus]

at least post the news report my friend lol

I didn't see any full translations when I saw the post on Reddit but I did find a translation for the whole email from this Channel A news now.

Spoiler: Full Email Translation

Subject: To Ju-young-nim

Ju-young-nim,

Do you believe that summoning me back to the company for an urgent discussion, as I was on my way home after work, and proceeding with an investigation, was a respectful way to treat me as a person?

Even though I was on my way home, I returned to the company with a sense of responsibility to discuss the issue. However, I had no idea that this would turn into an investigation, so I did not bring my PC. Despite my offer to return it the next day, you insisted that it must be handed over that very day, refusing to let me go home.

It wasn’t my desire to remain at the company, and yet, when I said I would return the PC the next day and leave, you forcibly prevented me from doing so. If that is not coercion, then what is?

Moreover, you falsely accused me, saying, “The security team confirmed through CCTV that you entered the building with a suitcase,” to test me. You even mentioned, “I will contact your parents through the emergency contact list in HR to verify the truth,” which was an inhumane and unreasonable method of conducting the investigation.

Even after I submitted the PC, it was natural for me to return home. Despite being worn out from the investigation, I was criticized for “leaving the company as if fleeing.” Why would you describe something so reasonable in such a way?

You stated that I was being investigated for misconduct, but I clearly explained that I was only fulfilling a request from the members to relay their intentions. Regarding the execution of advertising contracts signed before the termination of the exclusive contract, I accurately conveyed the members’ intentions to fulfill the contracts to the brand and also accurately conveyed the brand’s intentions to the members.

As a manager, I fulfilled my duty to accurately relay the members’ intentions, regardless of the situation.

However, you falsely stated in your email that I had “contacted several advertisers directly to propose signing contracts directly with the artists and brands, excluding the company,” and that I admitted to it.

The task of accurately conveying the members’ intentions has been twisted into an act of misconduct as if I acted against ADOR’s interests based on my own judgment and intent.

I clearly communicated to the brand that I was only conveying the members’ intentions and did not make any statements that could be misunderstood as representing ADOR’s stance or being related to ADOR.

The claims you included in your email are blatantly false and are acts of defamation against me. The requests I handled came directly from the members, who were unable to contact the brand themselves. Blocking or obstructing those requests could have constituted misconduct instead.

As I have mentioned, I am the members’ manager. The fundamental role of a manager is to accurately convey the members’ intentions and to convey the other party’s intentions back to the members accurately. Just because there was a conflict between the company and the members does not mean that my fundamental responsibilities as a manager change.

You accused me of lying, but what exactly are you claiming I lied about? At the time, I explicitly stated that I had conveyed the members’ requests, and I even mentioned specific cases like “000.” I also said I intended to share this information upon my return to Korea.

If I intended to hide anything, why would I voluntarily mention “000” now? Please do not distort or misrepresent the responses I provided.

During the chaotic situation in Japan, my top priority was ensuring that the members and staff could proceed with their numerous schedules without issues. I was the one who managed these schedules while respecting both the company and the members.

In contrast, the ADOR executives never provided any feedback or expressed interest in the schedules on site. I also instructed external contractors who inquired about where to deposit payments for guaranteed schedules to send them to ADOR.

The accusation that I engaged in misconduct is baseless. Thus, I disagreed with the claim that I was placed on standby due to misconduct and expressed my intention to resign in response to such treatment.

Even amidst the conflict between the company and the members, I worked respectfully with both sides and conveyed their positions objectively and accurately without distortion.

In fact, the current ADOR executives made a bizarre request of me, saying, “We thought that, as part of the management team, you would selectively communicate the company’s needs to the members or their legal representatives.”

Who has truly been working respectfully and diligently in this situation? Who is truly guilty of misconduct?

I faithfully performed my duties to ensure there was no confusion or misunderstanding while facilitating schedules so that the members and staff could focus solely on their work without disruption. Meanwhile, the ADOR executives showed no concern for the uncertainty and anxiety felt on-site, instead instructing me to selectively communicate only what was necessary for the company.

I backed up all company data and even showed proof of the backup. Any verification can be done with those backups. If there are any further questions or concerns, they should be addressed specifically with me.

The reason I formatted my PC before submitting it was that it contained personal files alongside company data. I did not damage either the PC itself or the company files stored within it.

Once again, I ask you to stop intimidating me by carelessly accusing me of illegal or unethical acts.

Lastly, the phone I use is my personal phone. What right do you have to demand to see my phone? Are you claiming to be a law enforcement agency with a search warrant? Or do you think you are above such institutions?

I am shocked by your blatant disregard for legality and ethics and was appalled to see false statements being published in the media.

I urge you to cease sending emails that defame, distort facts, or use absurd logic to intimidate me further.

 

[RandAlThor]

I didn't see any full translations when I saw the post on Reddit but I did find a translation for the whole email from this Channel A news now.

Spoiler: Full Email Translation

Subject: To Ju-young-nim

Ju-young-nim,

Do you believe that summoning me back to the company for an urgent discussion, as I was on my way home after work, and proceeding with an investigation, was a respectful way to treat me as a person?

Even though I was on my way home, I returned to the company with a sense of responsibility to discuss the issue. However, I had no idea that this would turn into an investigation, so I did not bring my PC. Despite my offer to return it the next day, you insisted that it must be handed over that very day, refusing to let me go home.

It wasn’t my desire to remain at the company, and yet, when I said I would return the PC the next day and leave, you forcibly prevented me from doing so. If that is not coercion, then what is?

Moreover, you falsely accused me, saying, “The security team confirmed through CCTV that you entered the building with a suitcase,” to test me. You even mentioned, “I will contact your parents through the emergency contact list in HR to verify the truth,” which was an inhumane and unreasonable method of conducting the investigation.

Even after I submitted the PC, it was natural for me to return home. Despite being worn out from the investigation, I was criticized for “leaving the company as if fleeing.” Why would you describe something so reasonable in such a way?

You stated that I was being investigated for misconduct, but I clearly explained that I was only fulfilling a request from the members to relay their intentions. Regarding the execution of advertising contracts signed before the termination of the exclusive contract, I accurately conveyed the members’ intentions to fulfill the contracts to the brand and also accurately conveyed the brand’s intentions to the members.

As a manager, I fulfilled my duty to accurately relay the members’ intentions, regardless of the situation.

However, you falsely stated in your email that I had “contacted several advertisers directly to propose signing contracts directly with the artists and brands, excluding the company,” and that I admitted to it.

The task of accurately conveying the members’ intentions has been twisted into an act of misconduct as if I acted against ADOR’s interests based on my own judgment and intent.

I clearly communicated to the brand that I was only conveying the members’ intentions and did not make any statements that could be misunderstood as representing ADOR’s stance or being related to ADOR.

The claims you included in your email are blatantly false and are acts of defamation against me. The requests I handled came directly from the members, who were unable to contact the brand themselves. Blocking or obstructing those requests could have constituted misconduct instead.

As I have mentioned, I am the members’ manager. The fundamental role of a manager is to accurately convey the members’ intentions and to convey the other party’s intentions back to the members accurately. Just because there was a conflict between the company and the members does not mean that my fundamental responsibilities as a manager change.

You accused me of lying, but what exactly are you claiming I lied about? At the time, I explicitly stated that I had conveyed the members’ requests, and I even mentioned specific cases like “000.” I also said I intended to share this information upon my return to Korea.

If I intended to hide anything, why would I voluntarily mention “000” now? Please do not distort or misrepresent the responses I provided.

During the chaotic situation in Japan, my top priority was ensuring that the members and staff could proceed with their numerous schedules without issues. I was the one who managed these schedules while respecting both the company and the members.

In contrast, the ADOR executives never provided any feedback or expressed interest in the schedules on site. I also instructed external contractors who inquired about where to deposit payments for guaranteed schedules to send them to ADOR.

The accusation that I engaged in misconduct is baseless. Thus, I disagreed with the claim that I was placed on standby due to misconduct and expressed my intention to resign in response to such treatment.

Even amidst the conflict between the company and the members, I worked respectfully with both sides and conveyed their positions objectively and accurately without distortion.

In fact, the current ADOR executives made a bizarre request of me, saying, “We thought that, as part of the management team, you would selectively communicate the company’s needs to the members or their legal representatives.”

Who has truly been working respectfully and diligently in this situation? Who is truly guilty of misconduct?

I faithfully performed my duties to ensure there was no confusion or misunderstanding while facilitating schedules so that the members and staff could focus solely on their work without disruption. Meanwhile, the ADOR executives showed no concern for the uncertainty and anxiety felt on-site, instead instructing me to selectively communicate only what was necessary for the company.

I backed up all company data and even showed proof of the backup. Any verification can be done with those backups. If there are any further questions or concerns, they should be addressed specifically with me.

The reason I formatted my PC before submitting it was that it contained personal files alongside company data. I did not damage either the PC itself or the company files stored within it.

Once again, I ask you to stop intimidating me by carelessly accusing me of illegal or unethical acts.

Lastly, the phone I use is my personal phone. What right do you have to demand to see my phone? Are you claiming to be a law enforcement agency with a search warrant? Or do you think you are above such institutions?

I am shocked by your blatant disregard for legality and ethics and was appalled to see false statements being published in the media.

I urge you to cease sending emails that defame, distort facts, or use absurd logic to intimidate me further.

yet again they do not understand.
if you are using the personal phone for business ect... did they not pay any attention to MJH and the other staff?

Next, at no time can they work as an intermediary between a brand and the members except as an agent of ADOR, which they clearly were not doing.

 

[Abeamus]

yet again they do not understand.
if you are using the personal phone for business ect... did they not pay any attention to MJH and the other staff?

Next, at no time can they work as an intermediary between a brand and the members except as an agent of ADOR, which they clearly were not doing.

I saw some people speculate this could be them trying to pull a gotcha where they word it to it sounds like Ador is saying the manager should work in their best interests and not the members. If this is the angle they are going with then I can't see court going anything but badly for them if it goes there since these kind of arguments won't work on a judge like they do the public.

 

[Selfmate]

NewJeans manager files workplace harassment complaint vs Ador CEO; agency responds

A manager for K-pop group NewJeans has filed a workplace harassment complaint against Ador CEO Kim Ju-young with the Ministry of Employment and Labor, intensifying the conflict that started between the K-pop agency and its former CEO Min Hee-jin and spread to NewJeans and now their manager.

According to a local media outlet on Tuesday, Dec. 10, the manager alleges being lured to a work meeting where a suspension notice was issued, followed by demands for the immediate return of a company laptop. The individual claimed to have been confined for approximately three hours until the laptop was surrendered.

The manager also accused the company of coercing the submission of a personal phone without any legal justification. Despite backing up all work-related data and leaving only personal files on the laptop, Ador allegedly initiated an investigation, using the formatting of the device as grounds for disciplinary action.

Ador refuted the claims, stating that the manager had directly contacted an advertiser to facilitate a contract between NewJeans and the brand without the company’s involvement.

“The manager has admitted to this type of communication, which constitutes a severe breach of the artist’s exclusive contract,” Ador said in a statement on Wednesday, Dec. 11. “As an Ador employee, the manager was responsible for ensuring the exclusive contract between the artist and the company was upheld. Under this contract, the artist is obligated to conduct all activities exclusively through Ador.”

Ador refuted the claims, stating that the manager had directly contacted an advertiser to facilitate a contract between NewJeans and the brand without the company’s involvement.

“The manager has admitted to this type of communication, which constitutes a severe breach of the artist’s exclusive contract,” Ador said in a statement on Wednesday, Dec. 11. “As an Ador employee, the manager was responsible for ensuring the exclusive contract between the artist and the company was upheld. Under this contract, the artist is obligated to conduct all activities exclusively through Ador.”

“This left us no choice but to suspend the manager and request the return of company assets, including the laptop. There was no coercion or illegal confinement during this process. Multiple requests for interviews to clarify his actions were declined,” Ador said.

The K-pop agency also stressed the importance of work-related information stored on the company laptop, which it said must be returned intact and without unauthorized deletion.

“The manager eventually returned the laptop after several hours, but it had been formatted to prevent data recovery, making it impossible to determine what was erased. Ador will conduct a thorough investigation and pursue legal action if necessary,” the company added.

Source: https://entertainment.inquirer.net/...assment-complaint-vs-ador-ceo-agency-responds

 

[Selfmate]

‘NewJeans must bear in mind…’: Korea Music Content Association urges girl group to return to ADOR or face Circle Chart removal risk

The Korea Music Content Association criticizes NewJeans’ contract termination, warning that the group may be removed from the Circle Chart. Read on for more details.

NewJeans held an emergency press conference on November 28, 2024, to officially announce their departure from ADOR. The group cited the company’s lack of plans for reform, unwillingness to address their requests, and "inability to protect the members" as the primary reasons for their decision. Following the announcement, the K-pop organization Korean Music Content Association (KMCA) urged the group to return to ADOR.

NewJeans held an emergency press conference on November 28, 2024, to officially announce their departure from ADOR. The group cited the company’s lack of plans for reform, unwillingness to address their requests, and "inability to protect the members" as the primary reasons for their decision. Following the announcement, the K-pop organization Korean Music Content Association (KMCA) urged the group to return to ADOR.

Following two major K-pop organizations—the Korea Management Federation (KMF) and the Korea Entertainment Producers' Association (KEPA)—the Korea Music Content Association (KMCA) has also criticized NewJeans’ decision. On December 13, 2024, the KMCA released a statement raising alarm over the increasing prevalence of "tampering," where external producers influence artists and their parents to terminate contracts with their original agencies. Citing cases like FIFTY FIFTY and recent allegations involving former ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin, the KMCA stressed that tampering jeopardizes the industry, affecting both small and large companies.

The association stated, “NewJeans must also bear in mind that they are not the only artists in the popular music industry.” They urged the group to uphold their exclusive contract and work towards a resolution through dialogue or judicial decisions while remaining mindful of their role as K-pop representatives and setting a positive example.

The KMCA also called on the government to reform inadequate laws governing artist contracts and announced plans to combat tampering. Proposed measures include removing artists implicated in tampering from the Circle Chart and excluding their music data from chart rankings and award eligibility. The KMCA emphasized the need for accountability and cooperation to restore order, ensuring the industry’s sustainable development.

On November 28, 2024, NewJeans held an emergency press conference to address their concerns about their future with ADOR and HYBE. During the event, the group officially confirmed their decision to leave the company, citing its failure to meet their demands.

Earlier, on November 13, 2024, NewJeans had sent ADOR a legal notice, demanding that the company address significant breaches of their exclusive contracts within 14 days. The group warned that failure to meet their demands would result in the termination of their contracts.

While ADOR claimed that the group did not wait for a response before holding the press conference, NewJeans argued that this was a misleading statement, as the agency failed to act within the allotted time frame. The group emphasized that the termination of their contracts was a response to ADOR's breach of duty and not due to any fault of their own.

The termination is effective immediately, and NewJeans reaffirmed their commitment to honoring any prior contractual obligations with third parties.

Source: https://www.pinkvilla.com/entertain...dor-or-face-circle-chart-removal-risk-1362613

 

[Selfmate]

Former ADOR employee's defamation lawsuit against Min Hee Jin referred to mediation

It's been reported that the 51st Civil Division of the Seoul Western District Court has referred a defamation lawsuit between former ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin and former ADOR employee 'A' to mediation. This means that the court recommends resolving the case through a mediated settlement rather than proceeding with a trial.

Previously in August of this year, former ADOR employee 'A' sued Min Hee Jin for defamation, demanding 100 million KRW (~ $70,000 USD) in damages. 'A', who reported a case of sexual harassment in the workplace while employed at ADOR, claimed that Min Hee Jin attempted to cover up the case. Later, in a series of press statements, Min Hee Jin revealed details of the case which 'A' claimed violated the Personal Information Protection Act. Along with a lawsuit against Min Hee Jin for defamation and false claims, 'A' also reported former ADOR vice president 'B', the accused assailant of the sexual harassment case, to the Seoul Western District Office of Employment and Labor for unfair management and labor practices.

In September, the district court approved of 'A's request to have Min Hee Jin's property listed as a provisional attachment to the defamation lawsuit, meaning that if 'A' wins the lawsuit and Min Hee Jin fails to pay the damages, the court has the right to seize Min Hee Jin's provisional attachment as a liability.

Source: https://www.allkpop.com/article/202...uit-against-min-hee-jin-referred-to-mediation

 

[Selfmate]

Korea Music Content Association calls on Min Hee Jin to clarify tampering allegations; Urges NewJeans to act prudently

The Korea Music Content Association (KMCA) has raised concerns about tampering allegations within the K-pop industry, calling for transparency and stronger measures to prevent such unethical practices. Tampering refers to the preemptive engagement with artists or their representatives before the conclusion of their contractual agreements with their current agencies, an act that threatens the industry's foundational ethics.

On December 13, the KMCA released an official statement, expressing, “We are gravely concerned about recent tampering attempts that have disrupted the industry. These actions undermine the integrity of Korea’s music industry, and we commit to taking all necessary measures to eradicate them.”

The issue of tampering came to the forefront during the FIFTY FIFTY controversy, which involved accusations of poaching artists from their existing agencies. Recently, allegations involving Min Hee Jin, former CEO of ADOR, reignited concerns about the pervasiveness of such practices.

The KMCA stated, “Producers employed by entertainment agencies have been observed using their influence to persuade young, promising artists and their families to break their exclusive contracts. The recent tampering allegations against Min Hee Jin highlight how deeply entrenched this issue is, regardless of the allegations’ validity. This underscores the urgent need for action.”

The KMCA called on Min Hee Jin to address the allegations with clarity, stating, “We urge Min Hee Jin to provide a clear and factual account regarding the recent tampering accusations reported in the media. The industry requires her to clarify the situation to prevent further speculation and damage.”

The association criticized the ambiguity of Min’s prior statements, asserting that they have fueled public and industry frustration: “The prolonged controversy has led to unnecessary fatigue within the industry. It is imperative for Min Hee Jin to resolve the matter through a direct and unambiguous explanation.”

Addressing NewJeans, a group closely linked to the controversy, the KMCA urged prudence: “NewJeans should ensure the faithful execution of their contracts and engage in genuine dialogue with their agency. If no resolution can be reached, they should await judicial decisions respectfully. It is vital for NewJeans to remember their responsibility as K-pop representatives and to act with caution in the public eye.”

The KMCA highlighted the broader implications for the industry: “NewJeans must consider the impact their actions have on fellow artists, aspiring musicians, and the integrity of the K-pop ecosystem.”

Legislative and Industry Action

The Korea Music Content Association called on the government and lawmakers to strengthen legal frameworks to combat tampering. “The current legal system does not adequately address the complexities of the music industry. New legislation tailored to the specific needs of the K-pop sector is necessary to ensure fairness and stability,” the KMCA emphasized.


allkpop logo
selfmate

9
VOTE
6


News
Posted by Grace-HA
1 hour ago 1,778
Korea Music Content Association calls on Min Hee Jin to clarify tampering allegations; Urges NewJeans to act prudently
AKP STAFF
m.entertain.naver.com

The Korea Music Content Association (KMCA) has raised concerns about tampering allegations within the K-pop industry, calling for transparency and stronger measures to prevent such unethical practices. Tampering refers to the preemptive engagement with artists or their representatives before the conclusion of their contractual agreements with their current agencies, an act that threatens the industry's foundational ethics.

On December 13, the KMCA released an official statement, expressing, “We are gravely concerned about recent tampering attempts that have disrupted the industry. These actions undermine the integrity of Korea’s music industry, and we commit to taking all necessary measures to eradicate them.”



Tampering Allegations Widespread in K-pop

The issue of tampering came to the forefront during the FIFTY FIFTY controversy, which involved accusations of poaching artists from their existing agencies. Recently, allegations involving Min Hee Jin, former CEO of ADOR, reignited concerns about the pervasiveness of such practices.


The KMCA stated, “Producers employed by entertainment agencies have been observed using their influence to persuade young, promising artists and their families to break their exclusive contracts. The recent tampering allegations against Min Hee Jin highlight how deeply entrenched this issue is, regardless of the allegations’ validity. This underscores the urgent need for action.”


A Call for Transparency from Min Hee Jin


The KMCA called on Min Hee Jin to address the allegations with clarity, stating, “We urge Min Hee Jin to provide a clear and factual account regarding the recent tampering accusations reported in the media. The industry requires her to clarify the situation to prevent further speculation and damage.”

The association criticized the ambiguity of Min’s prior statements, asserting that they have fueled public and industry frustration: “The prolonged controversy has led to unnecessary fatigue within the industry. It is imperative for Min Hee Jin to resolve the matter through a direct and unambiguous explanation.”



Message to NewJeans and Artists

Addressing NewJeans, a group closely linked to the controversy, theKMCA urged prudence: “NewJeans should ensure the faithful execution of their contracts and engage in genuine dialogue with their agency. If no resolution can be reached, they should await judicial decisions respectfully. It is vital for NewJeans to remember their responsibility as K-pop representatives and to act with caution in the public eye.”


The KMCA highlighted the broader implications for the industry: “NewJeans must consider the impact their actions have on fellow artists, aspiring musicians, and the integrity of the K-pop ecosystem.”



Legislative and Industry Action

The Korea Music Content Association called on the government and lawmakers to strengthen legal frameworks to combat tampering. “The current legal system does not adequately address the complexities of the music industry. New legislation tailored to the specific needs of the K-pop sector is necessary to ensure fairness and stability,” the KMCA emphasized.


Furthermore, the association announced plans to impose penalties on entities involved in tampering. “We are reviewing the possibility of excluding data related to artists and agencies implicated in tampering allegations from the Circle Chart. This includes removing their album and digital sales figures from our rankings. Additionally, we may discontinue providing data to major music programs and award shows,” the KMCA said.

Preserving Industry Integrity

The KMCA warned against the dangers of self-serving behavior, stating, “Tampering undermines the collective efforts of the industry and risks dividing it. The individuals and organizations involved must take responsibility for the damage caused and cooperate fully with investigations.”

Concluding its statement, the KMCA reaffirmed its commitment to the music industry’s sustainability: “We will continue to work closely with stakeholders to establish ethical standards and foster a healthy and thriving K-pop industry.”

Source: https://www.allkpop.com/article/202...g-allegations-urges-newjeans-to-act-prudently

 

[RandAlThor]

Former ADOR employee's defamation lawsuit against Min Hee Jin referred to mediation

It's been reported that the 51st Civil Division of the Seoul Western District Court has referred a defamation lawsuit between former ADOR CEO Min Hee Jin and former ADOR employee 'A' to mediation. This means that the court recommends resolving the case through a mediated settlement rather than proceeding with a trial.

Previously in August of this year, former ADOR employee 'A' sued Min Hee Jin for defamation, demanding 100 million KRW (~ $70,000 USD) in damages. 'A', who reported a case of sexual harassment in the workplace while employed at ADOR, claimed that Min Hee Jin attempted to cover up the case. Later, in a series of press statements, Min Hee Jin revealed details of the case which 'A' claimed violated the Personal Information Protection Act. Along with a lawsuit against Min Hee Jin for defamation and false claims, 'A' also reported former ADOR vice president 'B', the accused assailant of the sexual harassment case, to the Seoul Western District Office of Employment and Labor for unfair management and labor practices.

In September, the district court approved of 'A's request to have Min Hee Jin's property listed as a provisional attachment to the defamation lawsuit, meaning that if 'A' wins the lawsuit and Min Hee Jin fails to pay the damages, the court has the right to seize Min Hee Jin's provisional attachment as a liability.

Source: https://www.allkpop.com/article/202...uit-against-min-hee-jin-referred-to-mediation

So its sounds like there is a case there and the judge is say settle or ill do it...

 

[RandAlThor]

Korea Music Content Association calls on Min Hee Jin to clarify tampering allegations; Urges NewJeans to act prudently

The Korea Music Content Association (KMCA) has raised concerns about tampering allegations within the K-pop industry, calling for transparency and stronger measures to prevent such unethical practices. Tampering refers to the preemptive engagement with artists or their representatives before the conclusion of their contractual agreements with their current agencies, an act that threatens the industry's foundational ethics.

On December 13, the KMCA released an official statement, expressing, “We are gravely concerned about recent tampering attempts that have disrupted the industry. These actions undermine the integrity of Korea’s music industry, and we commit to taking all necessary measures to eradicate them.”

The issue of tampering came to the forefront during the FIFTY FIFTY controversy, which involved accusations of poaching artists from their existing agencies. Recently, allegations involving Min Hee Jin, former CEO of ADOR, reignited concerns about the pervasiveness of such practices.

The KMCA stated, “Producers employed by entertainment agencies have been observed using their influence to persuade young, promising artists and their families to break their exclusive contracts. The recent tampering allegations against Min Hee Jin highlight how deeply entrenched this issue is, regardless of the allegations’ validity. This underscores the urgent need for action.”

The KMCA called on Min Hee Jin to address the allegations with clarity, stating, “We urge Min Hee Jin to provide a clear and factual account regarding the recent tampering accusations reported in the media. The industry requires her to clarify the situation to prevent further speculation and damage.”

The association criticized the ambiguity of Min’s prior statements, asserting that they have fueled public and industry frustration: “The prolonged controversy has led to unnecessary fatigue within the industry. It is imperative for Min Hee Jin to resolve the matter through a direct and unambiguous explanation.”

Addressing NewJeans, a group closely linked to the controversy, the KMCA urged prudence: “NewJeans should ensure the faithful execution of their contracts and engage in genuine dialogue with their agency. If no resolution can be reached, they should await judicial decisions respectfully. It is vital for NewJeans to remember their responsibility as K-pop representatives and to act with caution in the public eye.”

The KMCA highlighted the broader implications for the industry: “NewJeans must consider the impact their actions have on fellow artists, aspiring musicians, and the integrity of the K-pop ecosystem.”

Legislative and Industry Action

The Korea Music Content Association called on the government and lawmakers to strengthen legal frameworks to combat tampering. “The current legal system does not adequately address the complexities of the music industry. New legislation tailored to the specific needs of the K-pop sector is necessary to ensure fairness and stability,” the KMCA emphasized.


allkpop logo
selfmate

9
VOTE
6


News
Posted by Grace-HA
1 hour ago 1,778
Korea Music Content Association calls on Min Hee Jin to clarify tampering allegations; Urges NewJeans to act prudently
AKP STAFF
m.entertain.naver.com

The Korea Music Content Association (KMCA) has raised concerns about tampering allegations within the K-pop industry, calling for transparency and stronger measures to prevent such unethical practices. Tampering refers to the preemptive engagement with artists or their representatives before the conclusion of their contractual agreements with their current agencies, an act that threatens the industry's foundational ethics.

On December 13, the KMCA released an official statement, expressing, “We are gravely concerned about recent tampering attempts that have disrupted the industry. These actions undermine the integrity of Korea’s music industry, and we commit to taking all necessary measures to eradicate them.”



Tampering Allegations Widespread in K-pop

The issue of tampering came to the forefront during the FIFTY FIFTY controversy, which involved accusations of poaching artists from their existing agencies. Recently, allegations involving Min Hee Jin, former CEO of ADOR, reignited concerns about the pervasiveness of such practices.


The KMCA stated, “Producers employed by entertainment agencies have been observed using their influence to persuade young, promising artists and their families to break their exclusive contracts. The recent tampering allegations against Min Hee Jin highlight how deeply entrenched this issue is, regardless of the allegations’ validity. This underscores the urgent need for action.”


A Call for Transparency from Min Hee Jin


The KMCA called on Min Hee Jin to address the allegations with clarity, stating, “We urge Min Hee Jin to provide a clear and factual account regarding the recent tampering accusations reported in the media. The industry requires her to clarify the situation to prevent further speculation and damage.”

The association criticized the ambiguity of Min’s prior statements, asserting that they have fueled public and industry frustration: “The prolonged controversy has led to unnecessary fatigue within the industry. It is imperative for Min Hee Jin to resolve the matter through a direct and unambiguous explanation.”



Message to NewJeans and Artists

Addressing NewJeans, a group closely linked to the controversy, theKMCA urged prudence: “NewJeans should ensure the faithful execution of their contracts and engage in genuine dialogue with their agency. If no resolution can be reached, they should await judicial decisions respectfully. It is vital for NewJeans to remember their responsibility as K-pop representatives and to act with caution in the public eye.”


The KMCA highlighted the broader implications for the industry: “NewJeans must consider the impact their actions have on fellow artists, aspiring musicians, and the integrity of the K-pop ecosystem.”



Legislative and Industry Action

The Korea Music Content Association called on the government and lawmakers to strengthen legal frameworks to combat tampering. “The current legal system does not adequately address the complexities of the music industry. New legislation tailored to the specific needs of the K-pop sector is necessary to ensure fairness and stability,” the KMCA emphasized.


Furthermore, the association announced plans to impose penalties on entities involved in tampering. “We are reviewing the possibility of excluding data related to artists and agencies implicated in tampering allegations from the Circle Chart. This includes removing their album and digital sales figures from our rankings. Additionally, we may discontinue providing data to major music programs and award shows,” the KMCA said.

Preserving Industry Integrity

The KMCA warned against the dangers of self-serving behavior, stating, “Tampering undermines the collective efforts of the industry and risks dividing it. The individuals and organizations involved must take responsibility for the damage caused and cooperate fully with investigations.”

Concluding its statement, the KMCA reaffirmed its commitment to the music industry’s sustainability: “We will continue to work closely with stakeholders to establish ethical standards and foster a healthy and thriving K-pop industry.”

Source: https://www.allkpop.com/article/202...g-allegations-urges-newjeans-to-act-prudently

They could get yanked from all the year end stuff ect. Not by Ador but the industry.

 

[Abeamus]

They could get yanked from all the year end stuff ect. Not by Ador but the industry.

Gonna be interesting to see how that develops as it has potentially to be messy depending on the implementation and I don't think completely necessary as NewJeans just like Fifty Fifty will lose their branding and become less valuable to advertisers as well as just being risky if contracts mean nothing to them.

 

[RandAlThor]

Gonna be interesting to see how that develops as it has potentially to be messy depending on the implementation and I don't think completely necessary as NewJeans just like Fifty Fifty will lose their branding and become less valuable to advertisers as well as just being risky if contracts mean nothing to them.

They have a very small window to "come to Jesus " as it were.
I truly think they have no Idea just how much of the success was not because of them.

MJH could be a monster outcast after this so tying themselves to her is a risk. One i think is unwise.

 

[Abeamus]

They have a very small window to "come to Jesus " as it were.
I truly think they have no Idea just how much of the success was not because of them.

MJH could be a monster outcast after this so tying themselves to her is a risk. One i think is unwise.

She'll definitely be a monster outcast if she goes to jail as with the cases she has against her you have to consider that a possibility and then NewJeans leaving Hybe becomes pretty much a death kneel to their career as outside of Hybe if they aren't with Min Heejin then they lose their entire identity with nothing to show for it.

I don't think they'll come to realization though as I saw a post from I think Hanni which was the emoji string text speak on a phone screen and the speculation around it at least was people having a bright future presumably after leaving Hybe.

 

[Abeamus]

Anyone got information on MHJs Shaman? Saw she vanished or something that I haven't heard.

 

[Selfmate]

So its sounds like there is a case there and the judge is say settle or ill do it...

I think I read that most court cases settled before actual trial

 

[Selfmate]

well over the weekend I think NJ started a new IG channel called jeanzforfree or something like that

 

[Abeamus]

I think I read that most court cases settled before actual trial

This tends to be true as for companies they generally don't want things to get to the "discovery" phase as then they could be in much hotter water.

well over the weekend I think NJ started a new IG channel called jeanzforfree or something like that

Yeah that's their new Instagram account as a more direct line to fans than the conferences I suppose.

 

[Abeamus]

As experts in the domestic K-pop industry, such as managers and producers, spoke out about the situation with New Jeans, which is in a dispute over its exclusive contract with Adore, it has been confirmed that Min Hee-jin's side has not provided any specific response to the three associations.

On the 13th, representatives from the Korea Music Content Association (KMCA), the Korea Management Federation (KMF), and the Korea Entertainment Producers’ Association (KEPA) told TV Daily, "We have yet to receive a response from NewJeans or Min Hee-jin's side," adding, "This issue is not just about NewJeans but is deeply related to the K-pop industry as a whole."

A KMCA representative particularly commented on the situation, stating, "All producers working in the domestic entertainment industry perceive this incident as highly threatening," and emphasized, "Since allegations of tampering have been raised, it seems necessary for NewJeans' side to provide a clear explanation."

The representative added, "We plan to release another statement soon."

KEPA shared a similar stance. A representative explained, "The reason we issued a statement was not to take sides with a specific company. We did so because we believe NewJeans’ contract termination declaration could negatively impact the domestic small-to-medium production industry," and urged, "We hope ADOR and NewJeans will engage in dialogue and reach an agreement."

KMF also expressed concern about the potential repercussions on the market. A representative stated, "If NewJeans' unilateral contract termination is accepted in the market, it could set a harmful precedent and practice within the entertainment industry," further noting, "Since this issue occurred in a major company, it could have an even greater impact on smaller companies."

Previously, the three associations each issued statements addressing the exclusive contract conflict between NewJeans and ADOR, calling for the establishment of legal measures to eradicate tampering practices

Source​

 

[RandAlThor]

As experts in the domestic K-pop industry, such as managers and producers, spoke out about the situation with New Jeans, which is in a dispute over its exclusive contract with Adore, it has been confirmed that Min Hee-jin's side has not provided any specific response to the three associations.

On the 13th, representatives from the Korea Music Content Association (KMCA), the Korea Management Federation (KMF), and the Korea Entertainment Producers’ Association (KEPA) told TV Daily, "We have yet to receive a response from NewJeans or Min Hee-jin's side," adding, "This issue is not just about NewJeans but is deeply related to the K-pop industry as a whole."

A KMCA representative particularly commented on the situation, stating, "All producers working in the domestic entertainment industry perceive this incident as highly threatening," and emphasized, "Since allegations of tampering have been raised, it seems necessary for NewJeans' side to provide a clear explanation."

The representative added, "We plan to release another statement soon."

KEPA shared a similar stance. A representative explained, "The reason we issued a statement was not to take sides with a specific company. We did so because we believe NewJeans’ contract termination declaration could negatively impact the domestic small-to-medium production industry," and urged, "We hope ADOR and NewJeans will engage in dialogue and reach an agreement."

KMF also expressed concern about the potential repercussions on the market. A representative stated, "If NewJeans' unilateral contract termination is accepted in the market, it could set a harmful precedent and practice within the entertainment industry," further noting, "Since this issue occurred in a major company, it could have an even greater impact on smaller companies."

Previously, the three associations each issued statements addressing the exclusive contract conflict between NewJeans and ADOR, calling for the establishment of legal measures to eradicate tampering practices

Source​

yes the precedent is awful, especially as weak as the whole case seems to be.
no outrageous contract length, no assault the best they have is supposedly a girls feeling were hurt and the boss was fired.

life is hard buttercup, and it rarely gets easy.

 

[Selfmate]

Danielle just picked as newest ambassador for Omega Watches

NewJeans Danielle‘s new announcement following leaving ADOR becomes a hot topic.

Yet, despite the members having terminated their exclusive contract, the group is still booked and busy. On December 17, Danielle was announced as the newest global ambassador for the luxury brand OMEGA.



Netizens shared how OMEGA only referred to Danielle by her name rather than NewJeans’ Danielle, with many emphasizing the group’s impact even after terminated the contract. Fans even shared that the OMEGA Instagram account only followed the new Instagram account for “Jeanzforfree” and not the official NewJeans account.

Source: https://www.koreaboo.com/news/newje...ncement-after-leaving-ador-becomes-hot-topic/