those seems like the facts however whether it proves she breached the contract is a separate question
I mean there could be a lot of things in the contract or SK tampering laws which deem it insufficient
maybe they'll learn their lesson (or not)
Why is bullshit my friend? the judge interpreted the law as he saw fit (I assume it was a he) if one party disagreed with that decision they can appeal which is what Hybe is doing.
Whether she violated the contract or not is a question of law and fact and the judge decided that she didn't...
HYBE Ordered to Pay Min Hee-jin 25.6 Billion Won
In a legal dispute between HYBE and former ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin over a 'shareholder agreement,' the court ruled in favor of former CEO Min. As HYBE's claims of an 'attempt to seize management rights' and other grounds for contract termination...
In $17M ruling, Min Hee-jin appears to gain momentum in other suits, lose face with NewJeans fans
A court sided with former ADOR CEO Min Hee-jin in her suit against HYBE, a ruling that effectively shifts the momentum back her way in a dispute that started in April 2024. Min is also set to...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Read more about our cookie policy.