but it could also be that the sith lords are ruling together (ie. colluding) division of power as oppose to fighting for total power - is that not a consideration? I mean we aren't highlander - "there can only be one"
you prefer me to not kill @ApinksBadPanda and thus we four sith lords will...
but the question is why does it not make sense (to you...since the intent in both situations is non-altruistic but the outcome is a good outcome no?
I mean in both situations the end benefits the doer of the action
or are you of the opinion that the benefit to the doer < than the overall good...
whilst true but still doesn't answer the question - even if I'm doing the act because of selfish intentions does the end outcome justify the result? (i.e the removal of a fellow evil sith)
thus you would also say that those who do deeds which are beneficial but because of non-altruist intentions...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Read more about our cookie policy.