About My New Username... (1 Viewer)

[Moguri]

Oh, AKP is another K-Pop forum I used to be on, but I’m not there anymore. I know a bunch of users from there and had some inside jokes with them, and want to make some of them into a joke just for fun.

will you explain it to me, when I don't understand it

 

[StirFriedPanda]

 

[Moguri]

wait there's four of us???

@roses_are_rosie
@DarthYouChanious
@ApinksBadPanda

so much for the rule of two???

so you admit to being evil too... and Mr. Rosie who I already had on my list of evil people too

 

[Yelena_Belova]

will you explain it to me, when I don't understand it

Of course! I’m not that evil!

 

[Moguri]

Of course! I’m not that evil!

YouChan :taeilsob:

 

[roses_are_rosie]

so you admit to being evil too... and Mr. Rosie who I already had on my list of evil people too

Such a tsundere. That's so cute

 

[StirFriedPanda]

Of course! I’m not that evil!

Sewing confusion is an important tactic!

 

[Selfmate]

That's cultural appropriation from them
I'll report them to the force

may the cultural appropriation forces be with you my friend

 

[Selfmate]

so you admit to being evil too... and Mr. Rosie who I already had on my list of evil people too

I admit to nothing my friend
I am the nicest happy go lucky neutral person you will ever find

 

[StirFriedPanda]

I admit to nothing my friend
I am the nicest happy go lucky neutral person you will ever find

I do believe you threatened to kill me with the rule of two....

 

[Moguri]

I admit to nothing my friend
I am the nicest happy go lucky neutral person you will ever find

you called yourself a sith lord and stated that you intend to forcefully end the lifes of your sith lord competetion.

I may be jumping to conclusions here.. but for me it is not nessecary for you to admit to anything at all anymore!

 

[Selfmate]

I do believe you threatened to kill me with the rule of two....

but you're evil
I'm doing the world a good deed lol

 

[Selfmate]

you called yourself a sith lord and stated that you intend to forcefully end the lifes of your sith lord competetion.

I may be jumping to conclusions here.. but for me it is not nessecary for you to admit to anything at all anymore!

see above
is the removal of another evil person not a good deed in an of itself? or do you believe that the intent matters more than the outcome?

ie. do the ends justify the means

 

[StirFriedPanda]

but you're evil
I'm doing the world a good deed lol

I would perfer the term misunderstood super villain! And if I'm going down I'm taking Bang Chan's soul with me in to oblivion.

 

[Selfmate]

I would perfer the term misunderstood super villain! And if I'm going down I'm taking Bang Chan's soul with me in to oblivion.

see evil...I am doing the world a great service lol

 

[Moguri]

see above
is the removal of another evil person not a good deed in an of itself? or do you believe that the intent matters more than the outcome?

ie. do the ends justify the means

your murderous intentions are based on the fact that you are an evil sith lord though, so the core problem is not fixed, even if you smite him down with all your hatred. It will just make you stronger

 

[Selfmate]

your murderous intentions are based on the fact that you are an evil sith lord though, so the core problem is not fixed, even if you smite him down with all your hatred. It will just make you stronger

whilst true but still doesn't answer the question - even if I'm doing the act because of selfish intentions does the end outcome justify the result? (i.e the removal of a fellow evil sith)
thus you would also say that those who do deeds which are beneficial but because of non-altruist intentions aren't really a good deed?
ie. a person donates to charity only because of the tax benefits?

 

[Moguri]

whilst true but still doesn't answer the question - even if I'm doing the act because of selfish intentions does the end outcome justify the result? (i.e the removal of a fellow evil sith)
thus you would also say that those who do deeds which are beneficial but because of non-altruist intentions aren't really a good deed?
ie. a person donates to charity only because of the tax benefits?

I think your comparison do not make too much sense, because even a selfish person that wants to save taxes by doing something good, probably has no further intentions to dominate the entire galaxy. Could you say the same?

 

[Selfmate]

I think your comparison do not make too much sense, because even a selfish person that wants to save taxes by doing something good, probably has no further intentions to dominate the entire galaxy. Could you say the same?

but the question is why does it not make sense (to you...since the intent in both situations is non-altruistic but the outcome is a good outcome no?
I mean in both situations the end benefits the doer of the action
or are you of the opinion that the benefit to the doer < than the overall good? is that your perspective?

 

[Moguri]

but the question is why does it not make sense (to you...since the intent in both situations is non-altruistic but the outcome is a good outcome no?
I mean in both situations the end benefits the doer of the action
or are you of the opinion that the benefit to the doer < than the overall good? is that your perspective?

I see the argument you are trying to make, but I will continue to ignore it, as it does not apply here

yes in theory, having less sith lords overall is better

but we also need to consider, that the opposing sith lord could keep you busy from causing harm to others, so potentially less harm is done overall. Also like I already said, striking him down could make you a lot more powerful. One more powerful sith lord could be a bigger problem than many weaker ones. This is the entire idea of the rule of 2, as you probably know only too well, your deception will not work on me!