- Joined
- 27 August 2018
- Messages
- 71,380
- Reactions Received
- 151,388
- Cards
- View Profile
- KS Coins
- 129,595
- Fandom
- Lex stan
- Gender
- Female
- Pronouns
- she/her
- Ship
- Wreck
In romance languages, the present tense conjugations of the verb for “to have” are the same or very similar to future tense conjugations. I’ll put a Spanish example below. The reason they’re so similar is because of Latin. In Latin, the word have was adopted in conjunction with infinitives to mean that someone needed to do something (similar to someone saying they “have to do something” in English). And because it’s common for languages to evolve obligatory statements into a future tense, you get Romance languages using the same conjugation for to have and the future tense.