Found this article (akp user, but source is stated as Naver) that gives more insight on the building itself and how Daesung bought it: More insight into Daesung's controversial Gangnam building + reportedly legally responsible as owner
This bit seems to make Daesung quite "innocent": "According to Daesung's real estate agent, there's no way Daesung could have known the complex was being used as a front for illegal activities as the businesses began operations in 2005 and Daesung only reviewed the "details of the lease" before purchase."
In best case scenario that's the case there and nth new pops up. I'm hopeful, but still bit concerned.
This bit seems to make Daesung quite "innocent": "According to Daesung's real estate agent, there's no way Daesung could have known the complex was being used as a front for illegal activities as the businesses began operations in 2005 and Daesung only reviewed the "details of the lease" before purchase."
In best case scenario that's the case there and nth new pops up. I'm hopeful, but still bit concerned.