- Joined
- 30 January 2023
- Messages
- 411
- Reactions Received
- 233
- Location
- seoul, south korea
- Cards
- View Profile
- KS Coins
- 3,874
- Fandom
- OnlyTrue
- Gender
- Female, Other
- Pronouns
- Human Being Psycho
Newspapers criticize passport low birth measures
Entered2023.03.27
Time: 7:47 AM
Modified 2023.03.27. at 8:43 AM
Jimin Roh
In addition, there are calls for legal action against the Democratic Party's hard-line supporters.
As the total fertility rate as of last year was 0.78, there is high concern about the problem of low births, but criticism continues that the measures proposed by the political circles are absurd.
The ruling People's Power considered expanding the deduction for gift property by the number of children, following the exemption from military service for fathers in their 3s who had three or more children. On the 20th, major newspapers pinched the gap between the diagnosis of the reality of the low-birth society and the discussion in the political sphere.
The Kyunghyun Sinmun pointed out that "the ruling party's perception of a low-birth solution is friendly to the wealthy." <The 'house where you are' tax cut, not the people's livelihood> Regarding the people's power plan to expand the differential deduction of gift property, the article said, "It is known that the government has also considered a specific plan to ensure that parents of one child do not pay taxes even if they receive gifts of up to 27 million won, parents of two children up to 1 million won, and parents of three children up to 1 million won.
The People's Power has previously become controversial after it was known that it had considered exemption from military service for a father in his 2s who had given birth to three or more children. It is seen as an accessible way for 'rich parents' who can afford to have children." However, he added, "It has not been decided whether the measures against low births reviewed will lead to actual policies," adding, "There is also an assessment that there is confusion that occurred during the leadership change process."
Dong-A Ilbo wrote an article titled <I want a world where I can raise my child rather than a world where I can raise my child" based on a survey of 2 young people aged 3~4 and an in-depth interview (FGI) with the Ministry of Health and Welfare'>s 3 Youth Advisory Group. "Nearly half of the respondents, 20.20 percent, cited 'work-family compatibility support,' such as maternity leave and reduced working hours during childcare, as the most important policy area.
On the other hand, only 39.60 percent of young people responded that "child care support," such as free daycare and childcare services, was the most important. It means that young people value policies that 'allow them to raise their own' rather than policies that 'raise' their children," he said, adding, "Housing support measures such as low-interest loans for newlyweds were less satisfactory.
In particular, the criticism is that the condition that 'married couples have a combined income of 2030 million to 46 million won per year' is a standard that does not reflect reality." The article <"Low birth rate policy, we must find a way to eliminate cynicism by 7 within 8 years," based on an interview with Cho Young-tae, a professor at Seoul National University's Graduate School of Public Health> said that the cynical perception of the 3 generation about the low birth rate policy and the reality that resources are concentrated in Seoul should be resolved.
▲Collection of page 3 of the main comprehensive daily newspaper dated March 27
Dong-A Ilbo also wrote an editorial titled <I want a world where I can raise my children rather than a world that raises my children> "One of the key policies that determine the birth rate is support for work-family compatibility. It is not a childcare support in the form of 'if you give birth, the state will raise you,' but a mandate to create an environment where 'I can raise my own child' while working," he said, adding, "I hope that the measures against low birth rate and aging that the government will announce this week will contain policies with a high sense of feeling."
The Seoul Sinmun newspaper saw the problem as a system littered with various "restrictions" rather than "demand-oriented policies." <The benefit of low birth measures, why is there no one around me">, cited the problem of paying 100,000 won every month to child caregivers as a representative example, but not receiving it from the age of 8 and over, when education expenses are in full swing.
This year, the maximum 700,000 won parental benefit paid to infants and children aged 0~1 was cited as an example of government support being biased towards infants and toddlers. He said the necessary measures include raising the scope of the tax credit from the current age of 20 and raising the age of young adults to 34 years of age or younger.
< continued, "Despite pouring 280 trillion, the failure to reverse the low birth rate ... Separate policies for each ministry are effective," > article conveyed the opinion of Kim Yong-mi, vice chairman of the Presidential Committee on Low Birth Rate and Aging Society. In the March issue of the monthly magazine of the Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs, Vice Chairman Kim asserted that the Committee on Low Birth Rate and Aging should function as a substantial control tower, saying, "Hundreds of ministries-specific projects related to responding to low birth rates were included without priority, and projects that are not directly related to the actual response to low birth rates were tagged as countermeasures against low birth rates."
Opposition lawmakers, such as Assemblyman Cho Chong-hoon, have also been criticized for the "1 million won per month foreign domestic assistance law without the application of the minimum wage." This was also recommended by Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon at the Cabinet Council in September last year. Moon Ju-yong, director of the National Social Affairs Department of the Kyunghyun Sinmun, said, <In a government-> column titled "Foreign Domestic Workers Measures to Overcome Low Births," he said, "It is important to create an appropriate social environment in which children can be born and raised, but the signal given by the current government is quite the opposite.
According to the government's teachings, young people now have to contribute to the country by having three or more children while working long hours for more than 60 hours a week, and those children should always stay in school until 8 p.m. to eat dinner without their parents," he said, adding, "This is why the MZ generation is ridiculing the government's birth and labor measures, but they still don't seem to know why."
The reality that even if there is parental leave, it cannot be used is also considered a problem. In a survey conducted by the labor organization Jig-Gung-Jil 119 and the Office Finance Ubuntu Foundation on 3~10 days among 1,000 employees over the age of 19 (released on the 26th), 39.6% of the respondents said that they could not freely take maternity leave. Non-regular workers (56.8%), workplaces with fewer than 5 employees (62.1%), and general employee salaries (51.5%) The majority of respondents said they could not take maternity leave. The problem of low births eventually leads to the problem of the government's plan to expand overtime hours, called the "69-hour week."
In an article titled <"A 69-hour workweek will force people to 'give up childbirth' altogether," Kyunghyun Sinmun said>, "The more 'weak in the labor market' or the 'young generation' that the government emphasizes day after day, the higher the proportion of people who cannot use parental and maternity leave." Even half of the private < paternity leave is spent, and the ruling party is only taking absurd measures against low births> saying, "What are the South Korean government and the ruling party doing? "The ruling party is using low births as an excuse to tinker with a de facto tax cut for the rich that will deepen the rich and poor," he said, criticizing that "gender equality policies that take into account women who have become reluctant to marry and give birth are nowhere to be seen."
Hankyoreh <Half of workers notice parental leave, will you have children> In an editorial, Hankyoreh said, "The 'right to claim reduction of working hours,' which allows workers to ask the company to reduce working hours for pregnancy, childcare, etc., has not become a real right," adding, "Instead of coming up with measures that can substantially reduce the burden of childbirth and childcare, the government is trying to reform the working hour system so that workers can work up to 69 hours a week (80.5 hours a week, 7 days a week). I can't help but ask if you think you can 'drive' parenting."
In the case of Kyunghyun Sinmun, the blind spot of the 69-hour week was pointed out from the perspective of "time poverty." <If you work 69 hours a week, you have a 4.5-hour "deficit" per week> article says, "If the working week is increased to 69 hours as the government is promoting, there will be 99 hours left.
According to the Living Time Survey conducted every five years by the National Statistics Office, the average "essential and compulsory hours" per week for employed people as of 2019 is 103.5 hours.
Aside from working hours, this is the amount of time needed to maintain personal life, such as sleeping, eating, commuting, and doing housework. Even if leisure is not included here, working 69 hours a week creates a 4.5-hour 'deficit,'" he said, adding, "Households with insufficient incomes fall into time poverty by increasing the number of hours they work to make up for this. Increasing the number of hours worked inevitably reduces the amount of time spent caring for the family. In order not to neglect the family, it is necessary to use services that take care of the family instead, and the expenditure increases, which leads to repeated economic difficulties."
"This chronic time poverty is also one of the causes of low births. Policies such as child support and child care support don't solve it, so they end up giving up on having and raising children."
The ruling party's policy is to minimize "confusion" through "publicity and persuasion." Kookmin Ilbo <Surprised by the storm after the '69-hour week' ... The article > reducing policy confusion in the future said, "The people's power will focus on strengthening policy capacity ahead of the general elections in April next year. The spearhead is the new Chairman of the Policy Committee, Park Loan, adding, "There are two keywords for strengthening policy capacity. One is "reducing mistakes," such as the "maximum 69-hour workweek" controversy. The other is the 'micro-targeting' strategy of segmenting targets such as MZ generations, low-income people, and small business owners to provide 'customized' policies."
In addition, the MDP representative is voicing his voice asking the so-called hard-line supporters to exercise restraint. At a public briefing in Ulsan on 24 August, they asked not to call it "watermelon," which is a derogatory remark of the screaming system. Regarding the manipulation of the profile image of lawmaker Lee Won-wook and the protests, he said, "I doubt that they are really our supporters or the Democrats," and appealed on Facebook to "stop immediately if you are a supporter of Lee Jae-myung and use that power to fight the anti-democratic forces that deny history." A personnel reshuffle is also expected to be carried out in the near future to elevate non-prominent lawmakers to key party positions. Newspapers that covered this criticized the hardline constituency, saying, 'a decisive response'.
Commenting on the hard-line constituencies, <MDP has no hope if it cannot control the behavior of hard-line supporters> an editorial in Kyunghyun Sinmun, "They actually pressured the party to make choices that were out of touch with the public sentiment in the process of the situation in the motherland, the establishment of satellite political parties, and the nomination process for mayors of Seoul and Busan." If Chairman Lee's call for restraint on this day is sincere, then a clearer signal should be sent." "The pro-Moon Jae-in (pro-Moon) circles within the party should not blame the current situation solely on Chairman Lee," he said, adding, "It is also necessary to consider establishing ethics regulations for the undemocratic behavior of party members at the party level."
Kookmin Daily editorial <'' threatening democracy... Representative Yi, respond decisively> said, "If you don't want to be on my side, stamp the coordinates, rush to the group, pour out '18 won donation' and text bombs, and unilaterally slander and denounce it, it is not a legitimate expression of intent, but collective madness and violence. Urging self-control only in words is "lip service" and cannot lead to real change. We must respond resolutely to defamatory acts by requesting an investigation at the party level and promptly establishing the facts and taking disciplinary procedures."
An editorial in the Chosun Ilbo said, <The National Assembly, which is controlled by the extreme supporters, > said, "Representative Lee should not only speak but also govern the collective action of the 'dog daughter,' which is no different from violence, with a clear corresponding act." In the case of the JoongAng Ilbo editorial <Reasons why it is difficult to believe the words of MDP Representative Lee Jae-myung> he said, "In order to convince the people to believe what he says, Representative Lee must take immediate measures to prevent recurrence, such as making false slanderous posters such as image manipulation and prosecution of those who spread them. We also need to come up with institutional measures to stop the tyranny of dog daughters."
Nightly clashes are raging over the Constitutional Court's decision that the Public Prosecutor's Office Act, the so-called "prosecutor's office" (complete deprivation of prosecutors' investigative powers) bill, and the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code are valid.
The Korea Ilbo said, "It is pointed out that it was the same time as the vote to amend the Media Law, which was the basis for the introduction of a comprehensive channel in 2009," adding, "Only the airlift between the opposition parties has changed depending on whether the bill is processed or not<." Fourteen years ago, the National Assembly pointed out in an article > repeating politics.
An editorial in the Korea Ilbo titled <Decision on 'Inspection Wanbak' Should Complement the System Instead of Political Dispute> said, "What the political circles should be working on now is to revise the relevant laws and enforcement ordinances," adding, "The 'Inspection Wanbak' Act (Revised Public Prosecutor's Office Act· The Criminal Procedure Code) has a legitimate legislative intent of checking prosecutors, but its content is poor and incomplete."
The newspaper asked, "Is it really the legislative intent to leave the investigation of 'corruption,' which is a political investigation, to the prosecutor's office and not to investigate 'defense projects'? The clause that deprived the complainant of the right to appeal the decision not to send the police to the police is also a target of criticism," he said, urging that "the problem that Minister Han Dong-hoon has significantly expanded the scope of direct investigations by the prosecutor's office through the enforcement decree (also known as 'prosecutor's suit') should be resolved in a larger framework by adjusting the bill."
Regarding Kim Ki-hyon, the representative of the People's Power of the People, who condemned the Constitutional Court's decision on 26 March to recognize the validity of the "Law on the Reduction of Prosecutorial Investigative Powers" (the Revised Prosecutor's Office Act and the Criminal Procedure Code), which condemned the Constitutional Court's decision on 26 March as "anti-constitutional sophistry by the 'Citizens, Right, and Country (Lawyers' Association for a Democratic Society, Woori Law Research Association, and International Human Rights Law Research Association) cartel," he said, "It is simply unacceptable for the head of the ruling party to contempt the constitution and intimidate the constitutional judges."><
The Chosun Ilbo published a column by Kim Young-so, a professor of political science at Yeungnam University, titled, <Constitutional Judges Should Be 'Nine Wise Men'>." Professor Kim Young-su said, "This aphorism came to mind when I saw the Constitutional Court's March 23 ruling on the Inspection and Wanbak Law. When this law was passed by the National Assembly last year, all sorts of tricks, expedients, and illegalities were rampant. However, the constitution "violated the right of members of the National Assembly to deliberate and vote on the bill," but declared the bill valid. But I can't think of a rule of law and democracy where due process of law is broken."
▲Article by Kyunghyun Sinmun of March 3
▲Seoul Newspaper article from March 3
Contradiction in promoting '69 hours a week' to solve low births
▲Article by Kyunghyun Sinmun of March 3
▲Kookmin Ilbo article of March 3
Criticism of the MDP's hard-line supporters, demand legal action against Lee Jae-myung
▲3월27일자 중앙일보 사설
'검수완박' 법안 둘러싼 여야, 충돌 말고 해야 할 것은
▲March 3 Korea Times article
Jimin Roh
Journalist Profile
Jimin Roh
subscription
Subscribers 2,413
Cheers 2,382
Jimin Noh is a reporter for Media Today's journalism team. I cover the president's office, the media's contacts, and public broadcasting.
This article was published in the press society section.
subscription
Press editorial news right from the main Subscribe today!
Resources:
Newspapers criticize passport low birth measures (naver.com)
Also Korean Translation shown on the website
Entered2023.03.27
Time: 7:47 AM
Modified 2023.03.27. at 8:43 AM
Jimin Roh
In addition, there are calls for legal action against the Democratic Party's hard-line supporters.
As the total fertility rate as of last year was 0.78, there is high concern about the problem of low births, but criticism continues that the measures proposed by the political circles are absurd.
The ruling People's Power considered expanding the deduction for gift property by the number of children, following the exemption from military service for fathers in their 3s who had three or more children. On the 20th, major newspapers pinched the gap between the diagnosis of the reality of the low-birth society and the discussion in the political sphere.
The Kyunghyun Sinmun pointed out that "the ruling party's perception of a low-birth solution is friendly to the wealthy." <The 'house where you are' tax cut, not the people's livelihood> Regarding the people's power plan to expand the differential deduction of gift property, the article said, "It is known that the government has also considered a specific plan to ensure that parents of one child do not pay taxes even if they receive gifts of up to 27 million won, parents of two children up to 1 million won, and parents of three children up to 1 million won.
The People's Power has previously become controversial after it was known that it had considered exemption from military service for a father in his 2s who had given birth to three or more children. It is seen as an accessible way for 'rich parents' who can afford to have children." However, he added, "It has not been decided whether the measures against low births reviewed will lead to actual policies," adding, "There is also an assessment that there is confusion that occurred during the leadership change process."
Dong-A Ilbo wrote an article titled <I want a world where I can raise my child rather than a world where I can raise my child" based on a survey of 2 young people aged 3~4 and an in-depth interview (FGI) with the Ministry of Health and Welfare'>s 3 Youth Advisory Group. "Nearly half of the respondents, 20.20 percent, cited 'work-family compatibility support,' such as maternity leave and reduced working hours during childcare, as the most important policy area.
On the other hand, only 39.60 percent of young people responded that "child care support," such as free daycare and childcare services, was the most important. It means that young people value policies that 'allow them to raise their own' rather than policies that 'raise' their children," he said, adding, "Housing support measures such as low-interest loans for newlyweds were less satisfactory.
In particular, the criticism is that the condition that 'married couples have a combined income of 2030 million to 46 million won per year' is a standard that does not reflect reality." The article <"Low birth rate policy, we must find a way to eliminate cynicism by 7 within 8 years," based on an interview with Cho Young-tae, a professor at Seoul National University's Graduate School of Public Health> said that the cynical perception of the 3 generation about the low birth rate policy and the reality that resources are concentrated in Seoul should be resolved.
▲Collection of page 3 of the main comprehensive daily newspaper dated March 27
Dong-A Ilbo also wrote an editorial titled <I want a world where I can raise my children rather than a world that raises my children> "One of the key policies that determine the birth rate is support for work-family compatibility. It is not a childcare support in the form of 'if you give birth, the state will raise you,' but a mandate to create an environment where 'I can raise my own child' while working," he said, adding, "I hope that the measures against low birth rate and aging that the government will announce this week will contain policies with a high sense of feeling."
The Seoul Sinmun newspaper saw the problem as a system littered with various "restrictions" rather than "demand-oriented policies." <The benefit of low birth measures, why is there no one around me">, cited the problem of paying 100,000 won every month to child caregivers as a representative example, but not receiving it from the age of 8 and over, when education expenses are in full swing.
This year, the maximum 700,000 won parental benefit paid to infants and children aged 0~1 was cited as an example of government support being biased towards infants and toddlers. He said the necessary measures include raising the scope of the tax credit from the current age of 20 and raising the age of young adults to 34 years of age or younger.
< continued, "Despite pouring 280 trillion, the failure to reverse the low birth rate ... Separate policies for each ministry are effective," > article conveyed the opinion of Kim Yong-mi, vice chairman of the Presidential Committee on Low Birth Rate and Aging Society. In the March issue of the monthly magazine of the Korea Institute of Health and Social Affairs, Vice Chairman Kim asserted that the Committee on Low Birth Rate and Aging should function as a substantial control tower, saying, "Hundreds of ministries-specific projects related to responding to low birth rates were included without priority, and projects that are not directly related to the actual response to low birth rates were tagged as countermeasures against low birth rates."
Opposition lawmakers, such as Assemblyman Cho Chong-hoon, have also been criticized for the "1 million won per month foreign domestic assistance law without the application of the minimum wage." This was also recommended by Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon at the Cabinet Council in September last year. Moon Ju-yong, director of the National Social Affairs Department of the Kyunghyun Sinmun, said, <In a government-> column titled "Foreign Domestic Workers Measures to Overcome Low Births," he said, "It is important to create an appropriate social environment in which children can be born and raised, but the signal given by the current government is quite the opposite.
According to the government's teachings, young people now have to contribute to the country by having three or more children while working long hours for more than 60 hours a week, and those children should always stay in school until 8 p.m. to eat dinner without their parents," he said, adding, "This is why the MZ generation is ridiculing the government's birth and labor measures, but they still don't seem to know why."
The reality that even if there is parental leave, it cannot be used is also considered a problem. In a survey conducted by the labor organization Jig-Gung-Jil 119 and the Office Finance Ubuntu Foundation on 3~10 days among 1,000 employees over the age of 19 (released on the 26th), 39.6% of the respondents said that they could not freely take maternity leave. Non-regular workers (56.8%), workplaces with fewer than 5 employees (62.1%), and general employee salaries (51.5%) The majority of respondents said they could not take maternity leave. The problem of low births eventually leads to the problem of the government's plan to expand overtime hours, called the "69-hour week."
In an article titled <"A 69-hour workweek will force people to 'give up childbirth' altogether," Kyunghyun Sinmun said>, "The more 'weak in the labor market' or the 'young generation' that the government emphasizes day after day, the higher the proportion of people who cannot use parental and maternity leave." Even half of the private < paternity leave is spent, and the ruling party is only taking absurd measures against low births> saying, "What are the South Korean government and the ruling party doing? "The ruling party is using low births as an excuse to tinker with a de facto tax cut for the rich that will deepen the rich and poor," he said, criticizing that "gender equality policies that take into account women who have become reluctant to marry and give birth are nowhere to be seen."
Hankyoreh <Half of workers notice parental leave, will you have children> In an editorial, Hankyoreh said, "The 'right to claim reduction of working hours,' which allows workers to ask the company to reduce working hours for pregnancy, childcare, etc., has not become a real right," adding, "Instead of coming up with measures that can substantially reduce the burden of childbirth and childcare, the government is trying to reform the working hour system so that workers can work up to 69 hours a week (80.5 hours a week, 7 days a week). I can't help but ask if you think you can 'drive' parenting."
In the case of Kyunghyun Sinmun, the blind spot of the 69-hour week was pointed out from the perspective of "time poverty." <If you work 69 hours a week, you have a 4.5-hour "deficit" per week> article says, "If the working week is increased to 69 hours as the government is promoting, there will be 99 hours left.
According to the Living Time Survey conducted every five years by the National Statistics Office, the average "essential and compulsory hours" per week for employed people as of 2019 is 103.5 hours.
Aside from working hours, this is the amount of time needed to maintain personal life, such as sleeping, eating, commuting, and doing housework. Even if leisure is not included here, working 69 hours a week creates a 4.5-hour 'deficit,'" he said, adding, "Households with insufficient incomes fall into time poverty by increasing the number of hours they work to make up for this. Increasing the number of hours worked inevitably reduces the amount of time spent caring for the family. In order not to neglect the family, it is necessary to use services that take care of the family instead, and the expenditure increases, which leads to repeated economic difficulties."
"This chronic time poverty is also one of the causes of low births. Policies such as child support and child care support don't solve it, so they end up giving up on having and raising children."
The ruling party's policy is to minimize "confusion" through "publicity and persuasion." Kookmin Ilbo <Surprised by the storm after the '69-hour week' ... The article > reducing policy confusion in the future said, "The people's power will focus on strengthening policy capacity ahead of the general elections in April next year. The spearhead is the new Chairman of the Policy Committee, Park Loan, adding, "There are two keywords for strengthening policy capacity. One is "reducing mistakes," such as the "maximum 69-hour workweek" controversy. The other is the 'micro-targeting' strategy of segmenting targets such as MZ generations, low-income people, and small business owners to provide 'customized' policies."
In addition, the MDP representative is voicing his voice asking the so-called hard-line supporters to exercise restraint. At a public briefing in Ulsan on 24 August, they asked not to call it "watermelon," which is a derogatory remark of the screaming system. Regarding the manipulation of the profile image of lawmaker Lee Won-wook and the protests, he said, "I doubt that they are really our supporters or the Democrats," and appealed on Facebook to "stop immediately if you are a supporter of Lee Jae-myung and use that power to fight the anti-democratic forces that deny history." A personnel reshuffle is also expected to be carried out in the near future to elevate non-prominent lawmakers to key party positions. Newspapers that covered this criticized the hardline constituency, saying, 'a decisive response'.
Commenting on the hard-line constituencies, <MDP has no hope if it cannot control the behavior of hard-line supporters> an editorial in Kyunghyun Sinmun, "They actually pressured the party to make choices that were out of touch with the public sentiment in the process of the situation in the motherland, the establishment of satellite political parties, and the nomination process for mayors of Seoul and Busan." If Chairman Lee's call for restraint on this day is sincere, then a clearer signal should be sent." "The pro-Moon Jae-in (pro-Moon) circles within the party should not blame the current situation solely on Chairman Lee," he said, adding, "It is also necessary to consider establishing ethics regulations for the undemocratic behavior of party members at the party level."
Kookmin Daily editorial <'' threatening democracy... Representative Yi, respond decisively> said, "If you don't want to be on my side, stamp the coordinates, rush to the group, pour out '18 won donation' and text bombs, and unilaterally slander and denounce it, it is not a legitimate expression of intent, but collective madness and violence. Urging self-control only in words is "lip service" and cannot lead to real change. We must respond resolutely to defamatory acts by requesting an investigation at the party level and promptly establishing the facts and taking disciplinary procedures."
An editorial in the Chosun Ilbo said, <The National Assembly, which is controlled by the extreme supporters, > said, "Representative Lee should not only speak but also govern the collective action of the 'dog daughter,' which is no different from violence, with a clear corresponding act." In the case of the JoongAng Ilbo editorial <Reasons why it is difficult to believe the words of MDP Representative Lee Jae-myung> he said, "In order to convince the people to believe what he says, Representative Lee must take immediate measures to prevent recurrence, such as making false slanderous posters such as image manipulation and prosecution of those who spread them. We also need to come up with institutional measures to stop the tyranny of dog daughters."
Nightly clashes are raging over the Constitutional Court's decision that the Public Prosecutor's Office Act, the so-called "prosecutor's office" (complete deprivation of prosecutors' investigative powers) bill, and the amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code are valid.
The Korea Ilbo said, "It is pointed out that it was the same time as the vote to amend the Media Law, which was the basis for the introduction of a comprehensive channel in 2009," adding, "Only the airlift between the opposition parties has changed depending on whether the bill is processed or not<." Fourteen years ago, the National Assembly pointed out in an article > repeating politics.
An editorial in the Korea Ilbo titled <Decision on 'Inspection Wanbak' Should Complement the System Instead of Political Dispute> said, "What the political circles should be working on now is to revise the relevant laws and enforcement ordinances," adding, "The 'Inspection Wanbak' Act (Revised Public Prosecutor's Office Act· The Criminal Procedure Code) has a legitimate legislative intent of checking prosecutors, but its content is poor and incomplete."
The newspaper asked, "Is it really the legislative intent to leave the investigation of 'corruption,' which is a political investigation, to the prosecutor's office and not to investigate 'defense projects'? The clause that deprived the complainant of the right to appeal the decision not to send the police to the police is also a target of criticism," he said, urging that "the problem that Minister Han Dong-hoon has significantly expanded the scope of direct investigations by the prosecutor's office through the enforcement decree (also known as 'prosecutor's suit') should be resolved in a larger framework by adjusting the bill."
Regarding Kim Ki-hyon, the representative of the People's Power of the People, who condemned the Constitutional Court's decision on 26 March to recognize the validity of the "Law on the Reduction of Prosecutorial Investigative Powers" (the Revised Prosecutor's Office Act and the Criminal Procedure Code), which condemned the Constitutional Court's decision on 26 March as "anti-constitutional sophistry by the 'Citizens, Right, and Country (Lawyers' Association for a Democratic Society, Woori Law Research Association, and International Human Rights Law Research Association) cartel," he said, "It is simply unacceptable for the head of the ruling party to contempt the constitution and intimidate the constitutional judges."><
The Chosun Ilbo published a column by Kim Young-so, a professor of political science at Yeungnam University, titled, <Constitutional Judges Should Be 'Nine Wise Men'>." Professor Kim Young-su said, "This aphorism came to mind when I saw the Constitutional Court's March 23 ruling on the Inspection and Wanbak Law. When this law was passed by the National Assembly last year, all sorts of tricks, expedients, and illegalities were rampant. However, the constitution "violated the right of members of the National Assembly to deliberate and vote on the bill," but declared the bill valid. But I can't think of a rule of law and democracy where due process of law is broken."
▲Article by Kyunghyun Sinmun of March 3
▲Seoul Newspaper article from March 3
Contradiction in promoting '69 hours a week' to solve low births
▲Article by Kyunghyun Sinmun of March 3
▲Kookmin Ilbo article of March 3
Criticism of the MDP's hard-line supporters, demand legal action against Lee Jae-myung
▲3월27일자 중앙일보 사설
'검수완박' 법안 둘러싼 여야, 충돌 말고 해야 할 것은
▲March 3 Korea Times article
Jimin Roh
Journalist Profile
Jimin Roh
subscription
Subscribers 2,413
Cheers 2,382
Jimin Noh is a reporter for Media Today's journalism team. I cover the president's office, the media's contacts, and public broadcasting.
- KBS board of directors even talked about resigning due to TV fee bomb thrown by the president's office
- Because of the deterioration of public opinion? President Yoon Seok-yeol in front of the camera pours out 25 minutes of remarks
This article was published in the press society section.
subscription
Press editorial news right from the main Subscribe today!
Resources:
Newspapers criticize passport low birth measures (naver.com)
Also Korean Translation shown on the website
