- Joined
- 27 August 2018
- Messages
- 71,380
- Reactions Received
- 151,388
- Cards
- View Profile
- KS Coins
- 129,595
- Fandom
- Lex stan
- Gender
- Female
- Pronouns
- she/her
- Ship
- Wreck
With those definitions, are dialects and languages mutually exclusive? Just based off the definitions you gave I don’t see mutual exclusivity so I’m curiousInteresting question that still gets a lot of debate:
languages are systems and arts of communication. Dialects are different channels of languages where there may be one shared element between one dialect or another but other elements are contrasted. For example a way that Scottish and Australian English are different is that Scottish has 7 vowel sounds whilst Australian has 20.
I think a big misconception is that if you can speak one language you can understand all the dialects, but that isn't true. Cantonese and Mandarin are different dialects but (I believe) a speaker of one of these wouldn't be able to understand the other and vice versa.
No, dialects and languages are not mutually exclusive. Theoretically there can be one language with one dialect but a lot of the times through geographic distribution, cultural groups shifting, etc, dialects develop.With those definitions, are dialects and languages mutually exclusive? Just based off the definitions you gave I don’t see mutual exclusivity so I’m curiousOr could 2 languages also be 2 dialects of a given language?
Yeah I used to think it was about mutual intelligibility but then realized that some different languages are mutually intelligible while some dialects aren’t.I actually get confused about this sometimes because the differences between dialects vs differences in some language families are too similar.
But then there are some dialects that just sound like a completely different language. Does this make sense?
Dialects do have an accent distinction thoso there's that.