Ngl I feel like this sums it up well. Good food isn’t usually an excuse for something you morally oppose, but bad food is an even worse excuse

Maybe not everyone thinks the food is bad, but I just don’t like it. I’ve only been once, but I probably wouldn’t have gone again regardless of all of the other stuff.
As for the question about hate the sin but not the sinner, that’s fine if it’s your view, especially if you truly don’t wish anyone harm or treat them different. But the money isn’t just going to causes like hate the sin but not the sinner, it’s going to efforts that hate the sin
AND hate the sinner. So if someone has a moral view of opposing homosexuality but supporting the idea of treating LGBT people equally, then there’s still reason to oppose Chick Fil A, because they’re still going against that moral view. For me I honestly don’t care that much, they have the right to do some of that as of present day (though some may have become illegal, like workplace discrimination). Just as I have the right to choose to not go and spend my money there, which while diluted by that point, can go to funding anti LGBT rights rhetoric. If someone else wants to eat there I’m not that opposed, it’s your life at the end of the day and my views shouldn’t always be what’s required, but the reasons for not going that I and some others share are at least partly founded in reason, not just a “the left says to boycott so we’ll unquestioningly do so” like some seem to think happens. People can make their own choices with these types of things.
And a reminder that the food was mediocre at best

The most important point for me