TWICE 'THIS IS FOR' TRACK DURATIONS (1 Viewer)

[Moguri]

it makes me a bit sad to see Twice follow the general trend, especially for the title track



@Once

 

[StirFriedPanda]

Is a 1:45 even qualify as a song?

 

[Moguri]

Is a 1:45 even qualify as a song?

it's probably the intro, those always used to be shorter

 

[catonkatonk]

It felt like Twice was the last holdout when it came to song lengths. No more I guess.

The album is still like 36 mins apparently (I didn't count it because I can't count), which is actually on par with their others for the most part?
I dunno... The preview was really assured. If they have a set of tracks that fit together, the short lengths could be a benefit. But it's hard to believe, most kpop albums don't cohere like that...

 

[Selfmate]

interesting

 

[fdonce]

Very sad

 

[OnlyCalB]

Nice!

 

[lexus]

Only two minutes for a title track?

 

[Moguri]

It felt like Twice was the last holdout when it came to song lengths. No more I guess.

The album is still like 36 mins apparently (I didn't count it because I can't count), which is actually on par with their others for the most part?
I dunno... The preview was really assured. If they have a set of tracks that fit together, the short lengths could be a benefit. But it's hard to believe, most kpop albums don't cohere like that...

I felt the same honestly

I saw somehwere today that fomrula of love (which had the same number of songs) was almost 20 minutes longer, thats really crazy how much things have changed