New MV BABYMONSTER - 'SUGAR HONEY ICE TEA' M/V (1 Viewer)

[fdonce]

wasn't a fan of spaghetti but easy crazy hot were fine

Spaghetti was oneof my favorite from them

 

[fdonce]

most recent song that dipped below a 5 for you my friend?

That nmixx collab with that euro guy.
Lemonade wasn't great either but its more pioe 4.5 maybe.

Its hard to truly have some bad songs for large group because if you end up producing for the big 4, chances are you have some idea what you're doing.

 

[Selfmate]

Spaghetti was oneof my favorite from them

That nmixx collab with that euro guy.
Lemonade wasn't great either but its more pioe 4.5 maybe.

Its hard to truly have some bad songs for large group because if you end up producing for the big 4, chances are you have some idea what you're doing.

off the top of my head of recent songs (from the big4)

Boompala
Lemonade
WDA
SHIT

were all not my cup of tea lol

 

[fdonce]

off the top of my head of recent songs (from the big4)

Boompala
Lemonade
WDA
SHIT

were all not my cup of tea lol

Its easier to fall in the shit side when your scales out of 5 thumbs vs a 1-10 scale

But yeah everything you listed weren't great...

 

[Selfmate]

Its easier to fall in the shit side when your scales out of 5 thumbs vs a 1-10 scale

But yeah everything you listed weren't great...

5 thumbs up to a 1-10 scale is basically double
hell even my eight year old knows that

 

[fdonce]

5 thumbs up to a 1-10 scale is basically double
hell even my eight year old knows that

A larger scale is less black and white. Out of 5 is like its either shit, ok, or incredible.

Vs out of 10, it can be shit, shitty, and shittiest or just not so shit

 

[Selfmate]

A larger scale is less black and white. Out of 5 is like its either shit, ok, or incredible.

Vs out of 10, it can be shit, shitty, and shittiest or just not so shit

point of correction: I've never called a song shit (except Sugar Honey Ice Tea but that's only because the acronym is SHIT) and certainly no variations of shit

 

[TrinityJade]

wasn't a fan of spaghetti but easy crazy hot were fine

Yeah didn't like spaghetti either
hot was probably the best out of the recent ones for me

 

[centen]

I like the MV. The sets are fun.

That's what I have.

 

[centen]

A larger scale is less black and white. Out of 5 is like its either shit, ok, or incredible.

Vs out of 10, it can be shit, shitty, and shittiest or just not so shit

For me personally:
1 = I didn't like it
2 = it was okay
3 = it was good
4 = it was really good
5 = amazing, perfection, no notes

I apply that scale to everything, book reviews, movie reviews, etc. I never understand people who are like "this book was a 4.75" like how can you even decide what the difference is between a 4.5, 4.75, and 5.0 at that kind of granular level... what could the author have done, specifically, to have bumped it up...? Most people can't articulate it, and neither can I! So I prefer a simple 5 point scale. If it reaches perfection, it's 5, if it falls short of that, it's a 4 lol.

But I also agree that a lot of people feel like low scores are "mean" so a 10-point scale probably feels easier to use. I know someone who gives ratings like:
3 = this was actually offensive and no one should read/watch/listen to this garbage
4 = I absolutely loathed this, but it wasn't, technically, offensive, just bad
5 = literally everything else
And it's like.. how is that useful???

Not to derail the S.H.I.T. thread with rankings and where shit goes.

 

[fdonce]

For me personally:
1 = I didn't like it
2 = it was okay
3 = it was good
4 = it was really good
5 = amazing, perfection, no notes

I apply that scale to everything, book reviews, movie reviews, etc. I never understand people who are like "this book was a 4.75" like how can you even decide what the difference is between a 4.5, 4.75, and 5.0 at that kind of granular level... what could the author have done, specifically, to have bumped it up...? Most people can't articulate it, and neither can I! So I prefer a simple 5 point scale. If it reaches perfection, it's 5, if it falls short of that, it's a 4 lol.

But I also agree that a lot of people feel like low scores are "mean" so a 10-point scale probably feels easier to use. I know someone who gives ratings like:
3 = this was actually offensive and no one should read/watch/listen to this garbage
4 = I absolutely loathed this, but it wasn't, technically, offensive, just bad
5 = literally everything else
And it's like.. how is that useful???

Not to derail the S.H.I.T. thread with rankings and where shit goes.

Nice scale, a person of reason.

Not enough shit

 

[Selfmate]

For me personally:
1 = I didn't like it
2 = it was okay
3 = it was good
4 = it was really good
5 = amazing, perfection, no notes

I apply that scale to everything, book reviews, movie reviews, etc. I never understand people who are like "this book was a 4.75" like how can you even decide what the difference is between a 4.5, 4.75, and 5.0 at that kind of granular level... what could the author have done, specifically, to have bumped it up...? Most people can't articulate it, and neither can I! So I prefer a simple 5 point scale. If it reaches perfection, it's 5, if it falls short of that, it's a 4 lol.

But I also agree that a lot of people feel like low scores are "mean" so a 10-point scale probably feels easier to use. I know someone who gives ratings like:
3 = this was actually offensive and no one should read/watch/listen to this garbage
4 = I absolutely loathed this, but it wasn't, technically, offensive, just bad
5 = literally everything else
And it's like.. how is that useful???

Not to derail the S.H.I.T. thread with rankings and where shit goes.

see @fdonce
centen has a 1-5 scale like mine

 

[fdonce]

see @fdonce
centen has a 1-5 scale like mine

Yeah just less shitty

 

[Selfmate]

Yeah just less shitty

all this shitty talk reminds me of