Official Card Rules and Ask a Card Team Member (2 Viewers)

[Yili]

There is a new member of Kingdom, can a card be added for him when he gets more pictures?

 

[Abeamus]

I'd also like to ask if a new member can get a card as J.Steph has a Rare but not a Common

 

[OnlyCalB]

I'd also like to ask if a new member can get a card as J.Steph has a Rare but not a Common

J.Steph Rare is now J.Seph Rare.

 

[Abeamus]

I don't know how anyone hasn't noticed it yet but since it's me I'll present it in a meme way

Tell me the difference between these 2 pictures

 

[Ahsoka]

I don't know how anyone hasn't noticed it yet but since it's me I'll present it in a meme way

Tell me the difference between these 2 pictures

Well oops, we’ll fix that in a bit

 

[Abeamus]

Also I'd like to ask Cal why when the trade involving SinB was done did you take mine when the formatting I use does the order which in this case would have indicated Exis SinB going straight to Lexus since obviously I couldn't have it and this formatting for that has been fine in the past.

The only reason I bring this up is in this scenario it now looks like I completed Viviz this week despite supposedly completing them first and now shows SinB as a trade when I got her through one of my Pranked Limited re-rolls which is quite the change from the reality of the set so I'd like to know if I need to be more specific and put something like "not mine" next to any cards I have that I'm using a 3 way trade for.

 

[OnlyCalB]

Also I'd like to ask Cal why when the trade involving SinB was done did you take mine when the formatting I use does the order which in this case would have indicated Exis SinB going straight to Lexus since obviously I couldn't have it and this formatting for that has been fine in the past.

The only reason I bring this up is in this scenario it now looks like I completed Viviz this week despite supposedly completing them first and now shows SinB as a trade when I got her through one of my Pranked Limited re-rolls which is quite the change from the reality of the set so I'd like to know if I need to be more specific and put something like "not mine" next to any cards I have that I'm using a 3 way trade for.

Unfortunately the only way to change a date on a card is by taking it and giving it back.

It's a superficial thing considering it's highly unlikely you'd ever give it away but in trades like that and even in re-rolls (where users immediately get a card they are rerolling back via a trade) we take it/give it back to update the date.

That way users can't re-roll the same card again the next day as the date still shows they can.

In a similar situation, being aware that we'd remove a card and give it back, uwu asked us to put the original trade date within the description of the card. It's likely you told me you completed VIVIZ in my thread (or made a completion thread) so I can find the date and put that on your card description if you like?


And yes, putting that the card should go "straight to ---" in the trade will be fine.

 

[Ahsoka]

Unfortunately the only way to change a date on a card is by taking it and giving it back.

It's a superficial thing considering it's highly unlikely you'd ever give it away but in trades like that and even in re-rolls (where users immediately get a card they are rerolling back via a trade) we take it/give it back to update the date.

That way users can't re-roll the same card again the next day as the date still shows they can.

In a similar situation, being aware that we'd remove a card and give it back, uwu asked us to put the original trade date within the description of the card. It's likely you told me you completed VIVIZ in my thread (or made a completion thread) so I can find the date and put that on your card description if you like?

That's not an everyone thing tbh because I do skip the taking it away and giving it back thing, and I wouldn't be surprised if others do because I don't remember ever having someone say that it was a requirement, unless I just forgot?

 

[OnlyCalB]

That's not an everyone thing tbh because I do skip the taking it away and giving it back thing, and I wouldn't be surprised if others do because I don't remember ever having someone say that it was a requirement, unless I just forgot?

I used to leave them too but then someone brought up that it's best to remove/give back a card as someone could re-roll the same card again in less that a week (and different CT member might not realise). So to just keep things updated (and fair) I started taking cards and giving back. I think it's just you and lex that leave cards? I've had my own removed and given back by other CT members in situations like that though.

I don't think it's a set requirement for CT to remove/give back and maybe any mention of it is on the old Discord server which we don't use now?

 

[Ahsoka]

I used to leave them too but then someone brought up that it's best to remove/give back a card as someone could re-roll the same card again in less that a week (and different CT member might not realise). So to just keep things updated (and fair) I started taking cards and giving back. I think it's just you and lex that leave cards? I've had my own removed and given back by other CT members in situations like that though.

I don't think it's a set requirement for CT to remove/give back and maybe any mention of it is on the old Discord server which we don't use now?

Not sure, but you’re right that we should take them away rather than leaving them.

 

[litc]

I used to leave them too but then someone brought up that it's best to remove/give back a card as someone could re-roll the same card again in less that a week (and different CT member might not realise). So to just keep things updated (and fair) I started taking cards and giving back. I think it's just you and lex that leave cards? I've had my own removed and given back by other CT members in situations like that though.

I don't think it's a set requirement for CT to remove/give back and maybe any mention of it is on the old Discord server which we don't use now?

Oh was that me abt the chuseok rerolling? That’s different I think than a 3 way

 

[Abeamus]

Unfortunately the only way to change a date on a card is by taking it and giving it back.

It's a superficial thing considering it's highly unlikely you'd ever give it away but in trades like that and even in re-rolls (where users immediately get a card they are rerolling back via a trade) we take it/give it back to update the date.

That way users can't re-roll the same card again the next day as the date still shows they can.

In a similar situation, being aware that we'd remove a card and give it back, uwu asked us to put the original trade date within the description of the card. It's likely you told me you completed VIVIZ in my thread (or made a completion thread) so I can find the date and put that on your card description if you like?


And yes, putting that the card should go "straight to ---" in the trade will be fine.

Re-rolls are fundamentally different though seeing as you yourself need to have had the card for a week so you can only take cards for re-rolls that a user has even if they get immediately replaced by someone else.

A multi person trade doesn't have a hold requirement and depends entirely on approach to the steps of the trade as to how it plays out.

As for the re-rolling over and over again through this that just isn't true either since you still need to source 3 cards you already have and if you won't use your own then it forces you to trade for others and in sets like Blackpink or Red Velvet getting hold of them is nearly impossible because so many people have them so nobody pulls them with so many cards on the table.

The only thing it actually bypasses is having to hold the card for a week which was only added to stop people just re-rolling cards instead of trading them so it'd potentially affect the trading economy but neither really are something game breaking.

 

[Abeamus]

Also not to throw shade or anything but you literally just introduced a feature that is forced to require trust based on the concept of it so as far as stopping people who would take advantage of things that's quite backwards

 

[litc]

Re-rolls are fundamentally different though seeing as you yourself need to have had the card for a week so you can only take cards for re-rolls that a user has even if they get immediately replaced by someone else.

A multi person trade doesn't have a hold requirement and depends entirely on approach to the steps of the trade as to how it plays out.

As for the re-rolling over and over again through this that just isn't true either since you still need to source 3 cards you already have and if you won't use your own then it forces you to trade for others and in sets like Blackpink or Red Velvet getting hold of them is nearly impossible because so many people have them so nobody pulls them with so many cards on the table.

The only thing it actually bypasses is having to hold the card for a week which was only added to stop people just re-rolling cards instead of trading them so it'd potentially affect the trading economy but neither really are something game breaking.

I agree tbh, that's why I was removing the chuseok cards for rerolls and then giving them back via daily

 

[litc]

Also not to throw shade or anything but you literally just introduced a feature that is forced to require trust based on the concept of it so as far as stopping people who would take advantage of things that's quite backwards

wait I'm confused, could you please explain further?

 

[OnlyCalB]

Re-rolls are fundamentally different though seeing as you yourself need to have had the card for a week so you can only take cards for re-rolls that a user has even if they get immediately replaced by someone else.

A multi person trade doesn't have a hold requirement and depends entirely on approach to the steps of the trade as to how it plays out.

As for the re-rolling over and over again through this that just isn't true either since you still need to source 3 cards you already have and if you won't use your own then it forces you to trade for others and in sets like Blackpink or Red Velvet getting hold of them is nearly impossible because so many people have them so nobody pulls them with so many cards on the table.

The only thing it actually bypasses is having to hold the card for a week which was only added to stop people just re-rolling cards instead of trading them so it'd potentially affect the trading economy but neither really are something game breaking.

Also not to throw shade or anything but you literally just introduced a feature that is forced to require trust based on the concept of it so as far as stopping people who would take advantage of things that's quite backwards

Next time there is a multi-trade like this, I'll leave the card.


And this whole thing isn't that deep. CT is a lot of work/free time and we do it just because. So things like this is more hassle/trouble than it's worth.

 

[Abeamus]

Next time there is a multi-trade like this, I'll leave the card.


And this whole thing isn't that deep. CT is a lot of work/free time and we do it just because. So things like this is more hassle/trouble than it's worth.

Since I don't wish to drag the issue on longer all I want to respond to is that it isn't this deep part because that sounds very dismissive of what I believe to be fair criticism of the game and you might not agree since I'm sure all of you have discussed things and come up with your own angles but that doesn't mean you've thought of every angle.

So if you don't like my angle I present on part of the game then you're more than welcome to argue your point with me and even if we couldn't see eye to eye then I'd call it a day seeing it won't get anywhere and that'd be the end of it as I don't bring things forward expecting to be accomodated with how I see the game.

Which I do take into account the effort considering in the past I've either talked about someone elses idea or even walked back my own due to it being a lot of effort so I wouldn't expect anyone of the cards team to do anything I would not be willing to do myself and considering I applied for the team you should know I'm more than willing to put my money where my mouth is and that's all I got to say.

 

[OnlyCalB]

Since I don't wish to drag the issue on longer all I want to respond to is that it isn't this deep part because that sounds very dismissive of what I believe to be fair criticism of the game and you might not agree since I'm sure all of you have discussed things and come up with your own angles but that doesn't mean you've thought of every angle.

So if you don't like my angle I present on part of the game then you're more than welcome to argue your point with me and even if we couldn't see eye to eye then I'd call it a day seeing it won't get anywhere and that'd be the end of it as I don't bring things forward expecting to be accomodated with how I see the game.

Which I do take into account the effort considering in the past I've either talked about someone elses idea or even walked back my own due to it being a lot of effort so I wouldn't expect anyone of the cards team to do anything I would not be willing to do myself and considering I applied for the team you should know I'm more than willing to put my money where my mouth is and that's all I got to say.

And your views are always listened to for sure, as one of the most active card collectors. Everyone's view/opinions are listened to and discussed. When it comes to features and making additions or changes to the Card games critique is always good. And we do our best to meet the requests of everyone.

 

[Day]

Cards team, how do you guys pick what idols will be given legendaries?
Is it randomly generated?

 

[litc]

Cards team, how do you guys pick what idols will be given legendaries?
Is it randomly generated?

Only cards with rares are eligible for legendaries. Of those cards, it is randomly generated. A card with a legendary already released can be picked, as can a card with a rare and no legendary, and receive a new one.

We're only doing korean cards with rares rn but plan to release international legendaries in the future