Tbh I believe that they probably did win, but I would prefer it if InSomnia's just focused more on a win for next week.
They could be talking about that, but I'm not 100% sure, but like you said, it's best to leave it and focus on what's coming up and try to get a win then. Plus it's Siyeon's birthday next week and it will be even more meaningful if they do get a win then.I do wonder about the score Insomnias came up with as 1 thing I have seen before although i'm not sure about it is that some shows only take the highest viewed music video so if Insomnias score is taking the Genie and Happyface views combined and if The Show only take 1 then the result could've been right.
It would be better though to focus on the upcoming week as I doubt The Show is gonna say anything now if they haven't already.
Yes, I can agree with that!I really prefer for Everglow to keep the win. I want my girls to get the spotlight; not to get a win in silence.
none of those numbers match posted values so i infer the net dudes are wrong in various areas of data collection.This is the article from TopStarNews. I'm using google translate:
SBS MTV 'The Show' No. 1 Score Counting Process Error?… Dreamcatcher video + pre-voting score, higher than public score
[Reporter Lee Chang-gyu] Dreamcatcher and CLC, who competed together while EverGLOW took first place after their debut on SBS MTV 'THE SHOW', which aired on the 24th It took second and third place.
EverGlow's growth, which won first place six months after his debut, deserves applause, but the Dreamcatcher fans pointed out that there was an error in the scoring process.
The show is divided into 'sound + record score', 'pre-vote + YouTube + expert', and 'real-time voting'.
Each score is divided into 40% of music, 10% of records, 20% of YouTube, 5% of pre-voting, 15% of expert scores, and 10% of real-time voting. This adds up to a total score of 10,000. That is, the score for each 1% is 100 points.
출처 : 톱스타뉴스(http://www.topstarnews.net)
![]()
Among them, it was reported that the sound source and record scores were not counted because they cannot be detailed counted.
In the case of pre-voting, Dreamcatcher recorded 54.31%, Everglow 23.36% and CLC 18.55%. Since Dreamcatcher was the number one in the pre-voting, they took 500 points and Everglow scored about 213 points.
In the case of YouTube scores, based on the data of kpop rader (as of September 15-21), Dreamcatcher's 'Deja Vu' had 2,263,630 views and Everglow's 'Adios' had 3,076,173 views.
If you calculate the score, Dreamcatcher scores 1,472 and Everglow scores 2,000. Comes out).
In addition, 1,500 expert scores are reflected.If assuming that Dreamcatcher received 0 and EverGlow scored perfect, the final score is 'Pre-Vote + YouTube + Expert', and Dreamcatcher gets 1,972, and Everglow is 3,773. Take it. The Dreamcatcher's score is 122 points lower than that of Evershaw.
Therefore, if you apply the error value and calculate the score again, the dreamer catches 7,972 points, and Everglow 7,914 points.
Dreamcatcher's score has lost more than 100 points than the published score, even though the expert score is excluded, and the reason for such an error is still unknown.
However, the Mnet 'M Countdown' also had a case where the first place was reversed due to a miscalculation of scores, so 'The Show' needs to explain it properly.
This was using google translation, so it may not be a reliable translation.none of those numbers match posted values so i infer the net dudes are wrong in various areas of data collection.
but they had fun playing with numbers.
So they are quibbling over line 2 and are happy with lines 1 and 3(most likely because they got the max)?This was using google translation, so it may not be a reliable translation.
This is another translation though, so please let me know:
Dreamcatcher and CLC, who competed together while Everglow took first place after their debut on SBS MTV 'THE SHOW', which aired on the 24th It took second and third place. Everglow’s growth, which won first place six months after his debut, deserves applause...
... but the Dreamcatcher fans pointed out that there was an error in the scoring process. 'The Show' is divided into 'sound + record score,' 'vote + YouTube + expert', and 'real-time vote'.
... Each score is divided into 40% of music, 10% of records, 20% of YouTube, 5% of pre-voting, 15% of expert votes, and 10% of real-time voting. This adds up to a total score of 10,000. That is, the score for each 1% is 100 points.
Among them, it was reported that the sound source and record scores were not counted because they cannot be detailed counted. In the case of pre-voting, Dreamcatcher recorded 54.31%, Everglow 23.36% and CLC 18.55%. Since Dreamcatcher was the number one in the pre-voting...
... he took 500 points and Everglow scored about 213 points. In the case of YouTube scores, based on the data of kpop rader (as of September 15 ~ 21), Dreamcatcher's 'Deja Vu' has 2,263,630 views and Everglo's 'Adios' has 3,076,173 views.
The score is 1,472 for Dreamcatcher and 2,000 for Everglobe. However, the score of Dreamcatcher is 1,465, according to the calculation of Chinese fans. Comes out). In addition, 1,500 expert scores are reflected. If assuming that Dreamcatcher received 0 and EverGlow scored...
... perfect, the final score is 'Pre-Vote + YouTube + Expert' and Dreamcatcher gets 1,972 points, and Everglo is 3,773 points. Take it. The Dreamcatcher scored by The Show is 122 points lower than that, and the conclusion is that EverGlow's error is 53 points.
Therefore, if you apply the error value and calculate the score again, the dreamcatcher 7,972 points, and Everglow 7,914 points. Dreamcatcher's score has lost more than 100 points than the published score, even though the expert score is excluded.
However, since Mnet 'M Countdown' had a case where the first place was reversed due to a miscalculation of scores, 'The Show' needs to explain it properly.
Ok, thanks ^-^So they are quibbling over line 2 and are happy with lines 1 and 3(most likely because they got the max)?
if the algorithm is wrong (and that would be interesting retroactively) good chance its wrong everywhere.
Code gets copy pasted a bunch.
Most likely they are making assumptions off of different data than the show had.