- Joined
- 8 November 2018
- Messages
- 19,199
- Reactions Received
- 60,790
- Location
- Tokki Topia
- Cards
- View Profile
- KS Coins
- 19,275
- Fandom
- Toxic
- Gender
- Female
- Pronouns
- She/Her/Drama Kween
- Ship
They didn't and haven't won anything against her so far. The courts ruled the texts were admissible and MHJ would need to provide her own to counter it. She did.but so has hybe i think they even ruled that the texts were in fact real
A large part of the verdicts were giving her text messages in full context which showed something very different from what Hybe edited and presented to the public.
One example: the empty shell conspiracy
According to Hybe: invoking her put option, somehow stealing NewJeans and leaving Ador
According to Min Heejin, the court and police: Min Heejin resigning at the end of her contract
The courts even made it a point to explicitly say even if Min Heejin had implemented anything she talked about in her texts, none of it would have been illegal or even possible without Hybe's consent. The text messages of the ideas all mention seeking Hybe's consent before going forward as well
The reality:
MHJ: Can I bring in outside investors?
Hybe: No
MHJ: Can I buy more shares?
Hybe: no
MHJ: Can I sell my shares and resign?
Hybe: not if I don't want you to
None of the above things could be considered a betrayal by anyone with common sense and that's exactly why they keep losing. Wanting a bigger piece of the pie and considering ways to properly go about it is just business. Not only that, all of these "plans" were contingent upon not getting the ideal contract renewal, so her main focus was always staying in the company and with Hybe. The one suggesting independence wasn't even Mine Heejin, it was the new VP who she was already pushing to resign
Hybe had an extremely favorable contract with her to the extent they could have perpetually kept her out of the industry
Or maybe it has something to do with the internal complaint she raised just weeks before they decided to audit Ador and publicly demanded she resign before the audit ever even completed? Publicly smearing someone before they can blow the whistle isn't uncommon at allWhats your counter narrative? that HYBE wanted to start all this drama and tank a very profitable group (which would be in clear disregard to fiduciary duties to stock holders{in itself maybe criminal}) just to escape paying a trivial amount (in a corporate sense), or that they hate girls?
Again, the only "evidence" they had were edited text messages that they only obtained in the audit. Before that, they had nothing but they still went public before the investigation demanding she resign
At the end of the day, not only is there no evidence of her doing what she's accused of, Hybe's (very misogynistic) attempts to smear her as a selfish, irrational, out of control woman doesn't line up with her actually reputation after 20 years in the industry. Hybe on the other hand...
Last edited: