- Joined
- 13 January 2023
- Messages
- 50,320
- Reactions Received
- 55,046
- Cards
- View Profile
- KS Coins
- 283,890
I'm not necessarily thinking using height to rob a bank per se but to use one's beauty or let's say charm to charm the workers to obtain more inside information pertaining to the bank's security or in a non-violent situation let's say to charm a person to obtain more favourable loans as a result of one's beauty whereas in absence of said beauty one would not be able to such favourable terms or inside information...I think that ethics isn’t only about the method, but also the reason (and just subjective). It’s just that some methods (like threatening someone with a gun) don’t lend themselves as nicely to ethical acts as some other methods may (though I’m not saying that they don’t exist at all). At least when it comes to general everyday life of the average citizen, because if the same question is applied to governments that can be massively different (though there are also many unethical government acts that involve pointing a gun at someone). All the other advantages you mentioned (beauty, height, ect) also have all those nuances too. But if you’re robbing a bank, while you might get some advantage because of height, usually the workers will find guns pointed at them more convincing to give up than you being tall. Though again, you can definitely use height to your advantage in unethical ways too. But often it’s not able to play as big of a role as other methods in those contexts .
But also ethics is just incredibly subjective so there’s that![]()
whilst ethics are not laws per se it's generally implied that such norms and morals are determined by the society that one is in since using weapons would have been perfectly fine in cavemen times but not so much now...