I don’t know Latin, so I can’t really disagree whether it has a difference in Latin specifically. From the gendered languages I have any knowledge of (Russian, Spanish, French, German) gender for inanimate objects is completely pointless from what I see. And some languages did lose gender, either completely or partially). There’s even a form of Russian in Alaska where gender only matters for living things, while anything non living is automatically masculine, as an example of a language that became gendered, but not like Latin or Spanish. And even in countries where gendered language is deeply rooted, there are people debating whether it’s a better idea to tend towards non gendered language in this day and time. But it also means that they have to massively alter the whole grammar structure, which is not easy at all. So just changing languages to not be gendered isn’t as simple as just wanting it, especially when you speak that language natively and have had a very long time to learn the genders of everything. But I still don’t see the purpose of gender in any gendered language I know anything about, aside from maybe art, but it’s also not required. English as an example of a language that lost its gender over time and can still create artwork praised worldwide with no issue. So gender as a concept of existing in languages overall seems to be often pointless, aside from maybe some exceptions, more specifically in indo European language.