- Joined
- 18 November 2018
- Messages
- 13,505
- Reactions Received
- 41,701
- Location
- Estonia
- Cards
- View Profile
- KS Coins
- 514
- Gender
- Non-Binary
- Pronouns
- He/They
- Ship
- Wreck
So the picture has become quite clear to me now.
Taeyong bullied a person B at school, calling her names and making fun of her looks
Another person A who went to the same school came out and talked about it.
Taeyong apologized to B personally and the victim B got compensated as well. (Hasn't been specified how much)
The informant A claims that Taeyong's apology was insincere in his apology + doesn't think Taeyong has kept up with his promises to donate to school violence causes etc.
SM ent. refutes that proving that Taeyong HAS been donating to those causes, volunteering and visiting victims etc.
Informant A claims that the Victim B was forced into signing a contract that forbids them from talking about it any more and if they do, they would be forced to pay back double the compensation. SM ent. claims B wasn't forced into anything and everything was approved of by B's lawyers. The contract also talked about the compensation B would be receiving and was made for security purposes.
Informant A also claims SM promised to get the post that was getting her a lot of hate comments, but never did so. SM claims that they never promised that, but have given A still legal advice on how to deal with the hate comments and the reason they didn't take down the post, is because it would be a pointless waste of money since it wouldn't actually stop the hate.
Pannatic made a post that was very good.
Overall it seems to me like.... the informat B has a grudge against Taeyong and is refusing to let it die. It isn't the victim who is unhappy with the compensation they have gotten or anything like that. It's just the informant trying to drag Taeyong down.
pannative.blogspot.com
Taeyong bullied a person B at school, calling her names and making fun of her looks
Another person A who went to the same school came out and talked about it.
Taeyong apologized to B personally and the victim B got compensated as well. (Hasn't been specified how much)
The informant A claims that Taeyong's apology was insincere in his apology + doesn't think Taeyong has kept up with his promises to donate to school violence causes etc.
SM ent. refutes that proving that Taeyong HAS been donating to those causes, volunteering and visiting victims etc.
Informant A claims that the Victim B was forced into signing a contract that forbids them from talking about it any more and if they do, they would be forced to pay back double the compensation. SM ent. claims B wasn't forced into anything and everything was approved of by B's lawyers. The contract also talked about the compensation B would be receiving and was made for security purposes.
Informant A also claims SM promised to get the post that was getting her a lot of hate comments, but never did so. SM claims that they never promised that, but have given A still legal advice on how to deal with the hate comments and the reason they didn't take down the post, is because it would be a pointless waste of money since it wouldn't actually stop the hate.
Pannatic made a post that was very good.
Overall it seems to me like.... the informat B has a grudge against Taeyong and is refusing to let it die. It isn't the victim who is unhappy with the compensation they have gotten or anything like that. It's just the informant trying to drag Taeyong down.
The informant of Taeyong's school-violence case, 'I'm doubting the sincerity in his apology... He needs to fulfil his promises'
Pannatic is your source for K-pop news, K-drama updates, K-celebrity news, and K-netizens reactions from South Korea's hottest online communities.