You've said a lot and I will try to dissect it.
the majority of rich people do have rags to riches stories who have worked their butts off to get where they are today.
Perhaps, but there are many families that consist of multi-generational wealth.. Old rich, if you will. You also haven't placed a cut off for what you mean by rich.. what is the cutoff from which you are saying is rich from which you consider to be upper middle class?
As a society, we have been taught that having money is the root of all evil, when in fact, money is neither good or bad, but if you have it, it means you can have more possibilities.
Fun fact that's actually a misquoted bible passage, but thats not your point. lol... But Money, like Alcohol, does tend to bring out people's dark sides.
Money doesn't make people change into a mean, nasty person who doesn't give a shit. It just means that the person was not very nice to begin with and can now do more bad with that money.
I agree, somewhat. But see my aforementioned maxim about money..
If you think about it, rich people actually pay more taxes than everyone else, do more charity work than everyone else, help others more than everyone else, etc, but of course the media portrays them as being the complete opposite.
It's also not all about the money, but it's what you do with the money that counts and if you want to use that money to do bad, then you will do bad in a big way and if you want to use that money to do good, then you will do good in a big way.
Rich people can also complain about paying high taxes.. Charity work is always iffy for me. Putting together a fundraiser and raising millions of dollars can be a show of how much status one has. I'm just gave 100,000 to unicef.. look how much of a humanitarian I am... and so on. One of my Statistics Professors once said, "Bill Gates giving $1,000,000 to Africa isn't really that impressive. Percentage wise its the same effect [to his pocketbook] as you or me giving $20... Its just that his $1,000,000 does more."
An overview on my thoughts: I don't hate rich people. I think a lot of policies that have been implemented specifically to help the poor have had the opposite effect. I also think personal choices will impact one's economic status. Having a child at 16 and another at 19 isn't going to increase one's odds of making good money.. Especially if the father (or fathers) are not supporting the children. Getting a Liberal Arts degree instead of a Mechanical Engineering degree is not going to help either. Spending frivolously of the limited excess money after bills are paid isn't going to either... You catch my drift. But as said above, policies like welfare can keep poor people trapped within a cycle. I need food and shelter to live. I am poor. I get food stamps and welfare. I need greater income to escape the cycle. Before I get my first few pay checks to get started to pay bills, I am cut off from welfare and EBT... Compound this with the fact that where I live minimum wage and full time job will get you a small one bedroom apartment, because all places have a income restriction where for full time work equals $1600 and you must make 2.5-3x what the apartment rent is.. You would only be able to afford a, around, $600 one bedroom apt... Which is fine if you are single, but if you have children and have the situation with welfare as stated above then you can become stuck... [This isn't my situation since I don't have kids, but many people deal with this.]
To shorten this up: Rich people aren't inherently the problem. policies that make sh*t harder to succeed are, which are implimented by governing bodies, and while many rich people are involved in government most aren't.. There are specific reasons why rich people are rich and I don't believe that they are sucking the poor dry and in a board room rubbing their hands together trying to come up with new ways to f**k over poor people.
One more side note: To drive the point home. Andrew Yang is without a doubt rich. Yet he is not advocating for the crippling economic systems that Warren and Sanders are. The wish list economics that are pipe dreams. Bernie Sanders is also rich, but selling a pipe dream of free tuition... His policies reflect an anti-capitalistic agenda, which will continue to keep poor people poor.. Having to pay for things gives incentive. Stressful as senior year of undergrad was, paying for it gave me extreme incentive to finish. If tuition is free, that economic-based incentive is gone. Plus, if tuition is free then there will be an influx in the workers entering specific fields with a limited number of positions. We need people to do jobs they don't want to do in order for society to function. Do you think anyone grows up wanting to deliver mail, pick up garbage, work as a receptionist, work at a grocery store, or work as housekeeping staff at lodges, motels, and/or hostels? But these are things that need to be done for businesses and society to continue to function. To some degree having a poor population is necessary. It isn't fair, but income equality in what is discussed in the media and politics will never happen. Things can and should improve, but a lower class will always be present. Everyone can't be rich.
And I'm done since I'm sure none of you will read the entirety of this.