Official Cards Suggestions (2 Viewers)

[Yili]

okk, cuz i wouldnt really want to double post all this in another thread, would seem like spam kinda idk, so thanks

this idea is really fun!! i can't wait~ man if i get stuck with a nako myself idek what i'll do, collect izone so she doesn't look like i got stuck with her card LOL

 

[Yili]

Maybe it would be helpful to put out a PSA announcement for the Card User group about this, because I feel like I've seen it in a couple threads
Some advice that after you have completed a trade, that it would be helpful if you marked somewhere on your OP or your title that the card has been traded?
I've seen some people go into a thread and try to make an offer only to find out the card has been traded a while ago
So the OP title can go from this:

Stray Kids Changbin for Trade!

to

Stray Kids Changbin for Trade! (TRADED)

It's just a thought but if an official announcement isn't needed, then I could make a thread about it myself sometime

What do you think, @OnlyCalB , is it too small of an issue that i noticed, i am not sure, it's not very big i just noticed it sometimes

 

[OnlyCalB]

Maybe it would be helpful to put out a PSA announcement for the Card User group about this, because I feel like I've seen it in a couple threads
Some advice that after you have completed a trade, that it would be helpful if you marked somewhere on your OP or your title that the card has been traded?
I've seen some people go into a thread and try to make an offer only to find out the card has been traded a while ago
So the OP title can go from this:

Stray Kids Changbin for Trade!

to

Stray Kids Changbin for Trade! (TRADED)

It's just a thought but if an official announcement isn't needed, then I could make a thread about it myself sometime

What do you think, @OnlyCalB , is it too small of an issue that i noticed, i am not sure, it's not very big i just noticed it sometimes

I've noticed some people use the prefix of "found" when they are trading, instead of "searching" too.


@Vikki has said that the cards section is getting a revamp with new prefixes, so I've been waiting for this as I'm anticipating it.

It will be nice to have that visual indicator in the title though so people browsing for cards in the card section can see which cards are still available. As the prefixes aren't too helpful on account of some using them wrong.

Not sure what prefixes Cards Team are coming up with, but maybe consider these @Vikki:

> Trading - used for when you are trading a specific card or cards.
> Traded - used when you have traded your card or all the cards within the thread.
> Searching - used for when you are looking for a specific card/s.
> Found - used for when the card/s you are searching for is found thus you are no longer looking for it.

These prefixes should offer more of a clue as to what exactly each thread posted in the card section means.

As long as people put the name of the card/s they are trading in their thread title, these prefixes will serve their purpose easily.

And if people are trading or searching for multiple cards, as long as they remove the card/s names when it's no longer applicable, then great.

 

[Ahsoka]

I've noticed some people use the prefix of "found" when they are trading, instead of "searching" too.


@Vikki has said that the cards section is getting a revamp with new prefixes, so I've been waiting for this as I'm anticipating it.

It will be nice to have that visual indicator in the title though so people browsing for cards in the card section can see which cards are still available. As the prefixes aren't too helpful on account of some using them wrong.

Not sure what prefixes Cards Team are coming up with, but maybe consider these @Vikki:

> Trading - used for when you are trading a specific card or cards.
> Traded - used when you have traded your card or all the cards within the thread.
> Searching - used for when you are looking for a specific card/s.
> Found - used for when the card/s you are searching for is found thus you are no longer looking for it.

These prefixes should offer more of a clue as to what exactly each thread posted in the card section means.

As long as people put the name of the card/s they are trading in their thread title, these prefixes will serve their purpose easily.

And if people are trading or searching for multiple cards, as long as they remove the card/s names when it's no longer applicable, then great.

I like those a lot better than the current ones, I'll bring it up with the admins to see if we can change them.

 

[Yili]

I've noticed some people use the prefix of "found" when they are trading, instead of "searching" too.


@Vikki has said that the cards section is getting a revamp with new prefixes, so I've been waiting for this as I'm anticipating it.

It will be nice to have that visual indicator in the title though so people browsing for cards in the card section can see which cards are still available. As the prefixes aren't too helpful on account of some using them wrong.

Not sure what prefixes Cards Team are coming up with, but maybe consider these @Vikki:

> Trading - used for when you are trading a specific card or cards.
> Traded - used when you have traded your card or all the cards within the thread.
> Searching - used for when you are looking for a specific card/s.
> Found - used for when the card/s you are searching for is found thus you are no longer looking for it.

These prefixes should offer more of a clue as to what exactly each thread posted in the card section means.

As long as people put the name of the card/s they are trading in their thread title, these prefixes will serve their purpose easily.

And if people are trading or searching for multiple cards, as long as they remove the card/s names when it's no longer applicable, then great.

these are excellent thank you, i wasn't even thinking about a prefix fix i just kept feeling bad for people showing up late in a thread like, i have this card can you trade me LOL

 

[OnlyCalB]

I like those a lot better than the current ones, I'll bring it up with the admins to see if we can change them.

Thank you.

 

[brekker]

thanks to @Reo for redirecting me here

I have an issue with unwanted cards. I have an issue with people being so disappointed about Zico who is a wonderful rapper, but that´s a bit too personal :D. But you see where it is coming from. I would like to perhaps, offer a cap on cards that are not longer interesting for people.
Could they be taken away from the randomizer?

 

[OnlyCalB]

thanks to @Reo for redirecting me here

I have an issue with unwanted cards. I have an issue with people being so disappointed about Zico who is a wonderful rapper, but that´s a bit too personal :D. But you see where it is coming from. I would like to perhaps, offer a cap on cards that are not longer interesting for people.
Could they be taken away from the randomizer?

You are interested in a softcap too? You aren't the first to suggest this as overall a softcap will benefit the game for sure.

 

[brekker]

You are interested in a softcap too? You aren't the first to suggest this as overall a softcap will benefit the game for sure.

hardcap probably :D.

 

[Myco]

thanks to @Reo for redirecting me here

I have an issue with unwanted cards. I have an issue with people being so disappointed about Zico who is a wonderful rapper, but that´s a bit too personal :D. But you see where it is coming from. I would like to perhaps, offer a cap on cards that are not longer interesting for people.
Could they be taken away from the randomizer?

You are interested in a softcap too? You aren't the first to suggest this as overall a softcap will benefit the game for sure.

hardcap probably :D.

i think a soft cap around 7-8 cards would be nice and a hardcap when a card reaches 10-11, with the amount of active card users that seems about appropriate amount since not everyone stans every group etc.

 

[Myco]

i think a soft cap around 7-8 cards would be nice and a hardcap when a card reaches 10-11, with the amount of active card users that seems about appropriate amount since not everyone stans every group etc.

from what i've seen it's usually about 5-7 people who collect the same group, could be off tho cuz i didnt really research that in detail lol

 

[brekker]

i think a soft cap around 7-8 cards would be nice and a hardcap when a card reaches 10-11, with the amount of active card users that seems about appropriate amount since not everyone stans every group etc.

That´s a really great idea. I mean let´s be honest here and look at how many of us are collecting the cards in general. 15 people? plus or minus? we don´t need that many cards as not all of us collect all groups.
I think it would also make graphics who made the cards more appreciated, not seeing being bothered by the cards they spent a lot of time to make.

 

[OnlyCalB]

hardcap probably :D.

i think a soft cap around 7-8 cards would be nice and a hardcap when a card reaches 10-11, with the amount of active card users that seems about appropriate amount since not everyone stans every group etc.

Hardcap is to harsh as it will mean Cards Team won't release the cards again. Ever.

A softcap serves it's purpose as at least when KS grows and new users join and want to play the card game, they aren't locked out of getting a card they really want. These are the "common" card sets right now, so they should always be available.

Softcapping at 10 cards has been suggested, but it could be lowered as you are right @Reo, I don't think there is more than around 8 people collecting a single set. However, the option has to be there to be able to lift the cap, if and when Cards Team needs to for people that want the cards.

 

[Myco]

Hardcap is to harsh as it will mean Cards Team won't release the cards again. Ever.

A softcap serves it's purpose as at least when KS grows and new users join and want to play the card game, they aren't locked out of getting a card they really want. These are the "common" card sets right now, so they should always be available.

Softcapping at 10 cards has been suggested, but it could be lowered as you are right @Reo, I don't think there is more than around 8 people collecting a single set. However, the option has to be there to be able to lift the cap, if and when Cards Team needs to for people that want the cards.

i wouldve said to ease the hardcap once we get more users in the forum that participate in the card collecting but yeah, otherwise if the hardcap is kept forever itll be impossible to get those card

 

[OnlyCalB]

i wouldve said to ease the hardcap once we get more users in the forum that participate in the card collecting but yeah, otherwise if the hardcap is kept forever itll be impossible to get those card

Oh fair enough. I guess hardcap/softcap is essentially the same thing then. Softcap just sounded more subtle and less frightening that Hardcap as some people might think it's a hard lock, forever.

 

[Myco]

Oh fair enough. I guess hardcap/softcap is essentially the same thing then. Softcap just sounded more subtle and less frightening that Hardcap as some people might thing it's a hard lock, forever.

yeah hardcap is like "shut that ish off" LOL, but i think a softcap is definitely needed depending on how many cards are going to be added in the future

 

[Myco]

This is kind of an addition to the softcap but what if you have a card u really don't want and there is no way to trade it with anyone, if you have it for a whole month u could be able to "refund" it, I'd rather not have the card than it getting dust sitting in my profile doing nothing, refund it either with another card pull or maybe Points, preferably Points cuz we could need another method how to earn points and this would maybe be an easy way for it?

 

[Ahsoka]

thanks to @Reo for redirecting me here

I have an issue with unwanted cards. I have an issue with people being so disappointed about Zico who is a wonderful rapper, but that´s a bit too personal :D. But you see where it is coming from. I would like to perhaps, offer a cap on cards that are not longer interesting for people.
Could they be taken away from the randomizer?

You are interested in a softcap too? You aren't the first to suggest this as overall a softcap will benefit the game for sure.

i think a soft cap around 7-8 cards would be nice and a hardcap when a card reaches 10-11, with the amount of active card users that seems about appropriate amount since not everyone stans every group etc.

Rather than a cap we're leaning towards implementing a system where you can get a card in exchange for 3 or so cards. So if you have 3 unwanted cards you can reroll basically, and get a new card. We haven't figured it out perfectly yet but we prefer this over the cap for a few reasons, but we think this will solve the issue just in a different way.

 

[Yili]

Rather than a cap we're leaning towards implementing a system where you can get a card in exchange for 3 or so cards. So if you have 3 unwanted cards you can reroll basically, and get a new card. We haven't figured it out perfectly yet but we prefer this over the cap for a few reasons, but we think this will solve the issue just in a different way.

this is a really fun idea

 

[Myco]

Rather than a cap we're leaning towards implementing a system where you can get a card in exchange for 3 or so cards. So if you have 3 unwanted cards you can reroll basically, and get a new card. We haven't figured it out perfectly yet but we prefer this over the cap for a few reasons, but we think this will solve the issue just in a different way.

Would you consider blocking getting the 3 cards you reroll with for a while? It would seem really unlucky if u got any of them directly again for daily task reward or sth