- Joined
- 26 September 2018
- Messages
- 8,197
- Reactions Received
- 27,145
- Cards
- View Profile
- KS Coins
- 0
- Gender
- Female
I'm sorry, but I haven't the slightest clue as to why SM isn't actually trying to seem professional here. I have a few points that I'm going to discuss, as they are main points that can really affect Red Velvet as a group, and the fans.
Firstly, the outfits. What is going on with Red Velvet's outfits lately? I watched a video recently that pointed out what we've all realized; Red Velvet always seem to look like they are going to different events. What's up with this? Bad Boy's outfits were good. Power Up's outfits were okay, but still coordinating. RBB was just...interesting. They seemed to either have an amazing look, or a horrible one. It's pretty odd, actually. Their outfits are not only ugly, but seem to be very uncomfortable. You have one member completely different from the rest. And as Youtube channel redvelvetsus posted, when they do match, why is Joy always different. As they stated, though Joy is taller, it is undoubtedly not that difficult to make them match.
View Joy's skirt. It looks odd, and is rather obvious. Wendy's boots don't seem to match at all either. Do the stylists not try to coordinate the outfits? Don't misunderstand me, I understand it's a difficult job. But the past outfits were not as bad, so what's up with it now? It doesn't help Red Velvet either, when you put them in outfits like this.
This one is okay, but they don't match in the slightest.
My second point would be their green screen job. This one is just weird tbh. SM is one of the biggest companies in South Korea, and they can't afford a better editor and a proper green screen? It's incredibly unprofessional and just sad.
What even is this one (Sappy)? This one is painfully obvious. I noticed it as the first thing I saw when I watched the Sappy teaser. The lighting is different, the coloring isn't correct, and so much is wrong with this.
Probably an Amino edit.
This one isn't as bad, but the coloring is off, yet again.
Also, can you promote RV in the U.S? Their Velvet concepts would become rather popular (Bad Boy, Peek-A-Boo).
They don't deserve this.
What are your thoughts?
Firstly, the outfits. What is going on with Red Velvet's outfits lately? I watched a video recently that pointed out what we've all realized; Red Velvet always seem to look like they are going to different events. What's up with this? Bad Boy's outfits were good. Power Up's outfits were okay, but still coordinating. RBB was just...interesting. They seemed to either have an amazing look, or a horrible one. It's pretty odd, actually. Their outfits are not only ugly, but seem to be very uncomfortable. You have one member completely different from the rest. And as Youtube channel redvelvetsus posted, when they do match, why is Joy always different. As they stated, though Joy is taller, it is undoubtedly not that difficult to make them match.
View Joy's skirt. It looks odd, and is rather obvious. Wendy's boots don't seem to match at all either. Do the stylists not try to coordinate the outfits? Don't misunderstand me, I understand it's a difficult job. But the past outfits were not as bad, so what's up with it now? It doesn't help Red Velvet either, when you put them in outfits like this.
This one is okay, but they don't match in the slightest.
My second point would be their green screen job. This one is just weird tbh. SM is one of the biggest companies in South Korea, and they can't afford a better editor and a proper green screen? It's incredibly unprofessional and just sad.
What even is this one (Sappy)? This one is painfully obvious. I noticed it as the first thing I saw when I watched the Sappy teaser. The lighting is different, the coloring isn't correct, and so much is wrong with this.
Probably an Amino edit.
This one isn't as bad, but the coloring is off, yet again.
Also, can you promote RV in the U.S? Their Velvet concepts would become rather popular (Bad Boy, Peek-A-Boo).
They don't deserve this.
What are your thoughts?
Last edited: